Table 3 Descriptives of Maternal, Adolescent and Dyadic Behavior during Fun Day Planning and a Stress Paradigm
Fun day planning | Stress paradigm | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
HC-G | BPD-G | HC-G | BPD-G | |
(n = 35) | (n = 38) | (n = 35) | (n = 38) | |
mean(sd) | mean(sd) | mean(sd) | mean(sd) | |
Mothers: CIB total | 2.33 (0.34) | 2.05 (0.58) | 2.24 (0.28) | 1.98 (0.44) |
Maternal sensitivity | 3.57 (0.58) | 3.29 (0.72) | 3.28 (0.49) | 2.86 (0.76) |
Maternal intrusiveness | 1.18 (0.22) | 1.42 (0.63) | 1.26 (0.37) | 1.30 (0.38) |
Maternal structuring | 4.58 (0.41) | 4.29 (0.66) | 4.71 (0.33) | 4.39 (0.48) |
Adolescents: CIB total | 2.37 (0.37) | 1.95 (0.67) | 2.32 (0.27) | 1.89 (0.61) |
Child engagement | 3.83 (0.66) | 3.43 (0.75) | 3.60 (0.48) | 3.15 (0.71) |
Child compliance | 4.63 (0.37) | 4.17 (0.75) | 4.61 (0.31) | 4.08 (0.74) |
Child withdrawal | 1.35 (0.28) | 1.75 (0.63) | 1.26 (0.24) | 1.57 (0.52) |
Dyad: CIB total | 1.31 (0.54) | 0.86 (0.84) | 1.20 (0.83) | 0.51 (1.08) |
Dyadic reciprocity | 4.10 (0.57) | 3.65 (0.78) | 4.16 (0.79) | 3.30 (1.07) |
Dyadic negative states | 1.48 (0.57) | 1.93 (0.95) | 1.76 (0.91) | 2.28 (1.15) |