Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Studies comparing clinical diagnoses with diagnoses generated with diagnostic interviews (cont.)

From: Implementing the semi-structured interview Kiddie-SADS-PL into an in-patient adolescent clinical setting: impact on frequency of diagnoses

STUDY INSTRUMENT Sample Size Dx Median kappa Range
Community sample
Bird et al.(1992) [49] DISC-C (Spanish) 386 5 .29 .04 to .42
  DISC-P (")    .39 .24 to .50
Schwab-Stone (1996) [50] DISC 2.3 – Parent 247 8 .47 .29 to .74
  " – Youth    .33 .27 to .77
  " – Combined    .49 .40 to .80
Outpatients
Rubio-Stipec et al.(1994) [51] DISC-2 (Spanish) – Parent 322 7* .32 .07 to .58
  " – Youth    .29 -.02 to .54
Ezpeleta et al.(1997) [52] DICA-R (Spanish) – Child 137 14 .31 -.04 to 1.00
  " – Adolescent    .31 .07 to .55
  " – Parent    .41 -.02 to 1.00
Fristad et al.(1998) [53] CHIPS – Parent version 21** 14 .49 .03 to .81
Teare et al.(1998) [54] " – Youth version 26** 12 .45 .01 to .72
Jensen et al.(2002) [3] DISC-P 2.3 245 10 .06 -.03 to .27
    5* .09 .00 to .44
Lewczyk et al.(2003) [55] DISC-IV 240 4* .09 -.04 to .22
Kim et al.(2004) [56] K-SADS-PL (Korean) 91 5* .41 .24 to .69
Ghanizadeh et al.(2006) [57] K-SADS-PL (Farsi) 109 16 .82 .49 to 1.00
  1. Note: Dx = Number of disorders on which the standard kappas were calculated
  2. *Broad diagnostic clusters; **In- and outpatients