Skip to main content

Table 2 Studies comparing clinical diagnoses with diagnoses generated with diagnostic interviews (cont.)

From: Implementing the semi-structured interview Kiddie-SADS-PL into an in-patient adolescent clinical setting: impact on frequency of diagnoses

STUDY

INSTRUMENT

Sample Size

Dx

Median kappa

Range

Community sample

Bird et al.(1992) [49]

DISC-C (Spanish)

386

5

.29

.04 to .42

 

DISC-P (")

  

.39

.24 to .50

Schwab-Stone (1996) [50]

DISC 2.3 – Parent

247

8

.47

.29 to .74

 

" – Youth

  

.33

.27 to .77

 

" – Combined

  

.49

.40 to .80

Outpatients

Rubio-Stipec et al.(1994) [51]

DISC-2 (Spanish) – Parent

322

7*

.32

.07 to .58

 

" – Youth

  

.29

-.02 to .54

Ezpeleta et al.(1997) [52]

DICA-R (Spanish) – Child

137

14

.31

-.04 to 1.00

 

" – Adolescent

  

.31

.07 to .55

 

" – Parent

  

.41

-.02 to 1.00

Fristad et al.(1998) [53]

CHIPS – Parent version

21**

14

.49

.03 to .81

Teare et al.(1998) [54]

" – Youth version

26**

12

.45

.01 to .72

Jensen et al.(2002) [3]

DISC-P 2.3

245

10

.06

-.03 to .27

   

5*

.09

.00 to .44

Lewczyk et al.(2003) [55]

DISC-IV

240

4*

.09

-.04 to .22

Kim et al.(2004) [56]

K-SADS-PL (Korean)

91

5*

.41

.24 to .69

Ghanizadeh et al.(2006) [57]

K-SADS-PL (Farsi)

109

16

.82

.49 to 1.00

  1. Note: Dx = Number of disorders on which the standard kappas were calculated
  2. *Broad diagnostic clusters; **In- and outpatients