Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic and diagnostic characteristics of the sample

From: Cognitive and affective perspective-taking in conduct-disordered children high and low on callous-unemotional traits

Characteristic

CD-high-CU

(n = 30)

CD-low-CU

(n = 42)

Control

(n = 50)

Statistic

Age. M (SD)

9.37 (1.2)

9.00 (.98)

9.04 (.70)

F (2, 119) = 1.6

SES. M (SD)

33.23 (18.20)

36.10 (19.53)

38.32 (20.59)

χ2(2, 122) = 2.78

Gender. % female

3.3%

4.8%

6%

χ2 (2, 122) = .48

CU Traits. Mdn (IQR)

10 (1)a

4 (4)b

3.5 (3)b

χ2 (2, 122) = 69.62**

Conduct problems. Mdn (IQR)

18 (3)a

15 (5.25)b

4 (5)c

χ2(2, 122) = 91.53**

CD/ODD diagnosis (%)

100

100

0

 

ADHD diagnosis (%)

33.3%

28.57%

14%

χ2(2, 122) = 4.68

Anxiety diagnosis (%)

16.67%

26.19%

14%

χ2(2, 122) = 2.34

Depression diagnosis (%)

20%

16.67%

4%

χ2(2, 122) = 5.59

Expressive language. Mdn(IQR)

93 (20.25)

90.5 (27.25)

95.5 (12)

χ2(2, 122) = 2.42

  1. Note: Level of conduct problems was determined by the Revised Rutter Teacher conduct difficulties subscale (Hogg et al., 1997); ODD = Oppositional Defiant Disorder; ADHD = Attention Deficit and Hyperactive Disorder; ADHD, CD/ODD, Anxiety and Depression diagnoses were determined by diagnostic information contained in the participants files. Expressive language was determined by the Word Definition Test (WD-BASII) British Ability Scales II; SES (socioeconomic status) was determined by the Duncan's socioeconomic index (Hauser & Featherman, 1977); M: Mean, Mdn: Median; IQR = Interquartile Range; SD = Standard Deviation; Effects on CD diagnosis could not be calculated because no diagnoses were present in the control group; Medians in the same row that do not share subscripts differ at p < .05 in the Mann-Whitney U procedure.
  2. **p < .001