From: Impact of resilience enhancing programs on youth surviving the Beslan school siege
 | Model 1: Time Only | Model 2: Specification 1 Hostage Status Interaction | Model 2: Specification 2 Losses Interaction | Model 2: Specification 3 Injuries Interaction | Model 2: Specification 4 Losses/Injuries Interaction |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main effects | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
   Effect of Time |  |  |  |  |  |
Follow-up 2 | 3.72 (.84)*** | 6.69 (1.34)*** | 2.25 (.89)* | 2.30 (.91)* | 3.23 (1.11)*** |
Follow-up 1 | 3.25 (.38)*** | 3.48 (.58)*** | 3.22 (.49)*** | 3.60 (.61)*** | 4.00 (.78)*** |
Study baseline | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
Effect of Traumatization | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
   Hostage Status |  |  |  |  |  |
Hostage | Â | -8.89 (2.76)*** | Â | Â | Â |
Non-hostage | Â | Ref. | Â | Â | Â |
   Losses |  |  |  |  |  |
2+ losses | Â | Â | -13.38 (3.93)*** | Â | Â |
1 loss | Â | Â | -2.70 (3.51) | Â | Â |
No losses | Â | Â | Ref. | Â | Â |
   Injuries |  |  |  |  |  |
3+ injuries | Â | Â | Â | -11.67 (3.92)** | Â |
1-2 injuries | Â | Â | Â | -1.41 (2.83) | Â |
No injuries | Â | Â | Â | Ref. | Â |
   Losses/Injuries |  |  |  |  |  |
3+ losses/injuries | Â | Â | Â | Â | -11.78 (3.51)*** |
1-2 losses/injuries | Â | Â | Â | Â | -0.64 (2.95) |
No injuries | Â | Â | Â | Â | Ref. |
Interactions of time with traumatization | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
   Hostage Status |  |  |  |  |  |
Follow-up 2 * hostage | Â | 5.82 (1.58)*** | Â | Â | Â |
Follow-up 1 * hostage | Â | 0.44 (0.76) | Â | Â | Â |
Study baseline * hostage | Â | Ref. | Â | Â | Â |
   Losses |  |  |  |  |  |
Follow-up 2 * 2+ losses | Â | Â | 6.69 (2.44)** | Â | Â |
Follow-up 2 * 1 loss | Â | Â | 1.11 (2.10) | Â | Â |
Follow-up 2 * 0 losses | Â | Â | Ref. | Â | Â |
Follow-up 1 * 2+ losses | Â | Â | 1.25 (.93) | Â | Â |
Follow-up 1 * 1 loss | Â | Â | -.81 (.95) | Â | Â |
Follow-up 1 * 0 losses | Â | Â | Ref. | Â | Â |
   Injuries |  |  |  |  |  |
Follow-up 2 * 3+ injuries | Â | Â | Â | 5.17 (2.06)* | Â |
Follow-up 2 * 1-2 injuries | Â | Â | Â | .98 (1.65) | Â |
Follow-up 2 * 0 injuries | Â | Â | Â | Ref. | Â |
Follow-up 1 * 3+ injuries | Â | Â | Â | -.42 (.86) | Â |
Follow-up 1 * 1-2 injuries | Â | Â | Â | -.53 (.87) | Â |
Follow-up 1 * 0 injuries | Â | Â | Â | Ref. | Â |
   Losses/Injuries |  |  |  |  |  |
Follow-up 2 * 3+ losses/injuries | Â | Â | Â | Â | 4.99 (1.79)** |
Follow-up 2 * 1-2 losses/injuries | Â | Â | Â | Â | 0.07 (0.95) |
Follow-up 2 * 0 losses/injuries | Â | Â | Â | Â | Ref. |
Follow-up 1 * 3+ losses/injuries | Â | Â | Â | Â | -2.11 (1.70) |
Follow-up 1 * 1-2 losses/injuries | Â | Â | Â | Â | -1.63 (0.98) |
Follow-up 1 * 0 losses/injuries | Â | Â | Â | Â | Ref. |
   Intercept | 70.15 (1.44)*** | 65.61 (2.35)*** | 73.20 (1.58)*** | 72.97 (1.85)*** | 73.95 (2.20)*** |