Skip to main content

Table 3 Effects of CBT focusing on cognition for primary and secondary outcome measures across time

From: Cognitive behavioral therapy of socially phobic children focusing on cognition: a randomised wait-list control study

 

Treatment group (n = 21)

Wait list (n = 23)

 
 

M (SD)

M (SD)

Group effect

CHILD-COMPLETED PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory for Children, German version (SPAIK)

Pre-treatment

24.47 (7.23)

20.60 (6.09)

F(1,42) = 3.71 ns

Post-treatment

12.30 (9.13)

18.41 (8.53)

F(1,42) = 5.26 *

CLINICIAN-COMPLETED PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Severity (DIPS-K)

   

Pre-treatment

5.33 (1.24)

5.17 (0.58)

F(1,42) = .31 ns

Post-treatment

3.43 (2.44)

4.96 (0.42)

F(1,42) = 6.33*

CHILD-COMPLETED SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Coping Questionnaire - Child (CQ-C)

  

Pre-treatment

3.11 (0.62)

3.10 (0.57)

F(1,42) = .01 ns

Post-treatment

1.77 (1.19)

2.27 (0.89)

F(1,42) = 2.57 ns

Socially Anxious Cognitions Scale for Children (SAKK)

Positive Self-evaluation

  

Pre-treatment

19.83 (7.67)

13.23 (6.64)

F(1,37) = 8.21**

Post-treatment

24.52 (8.14)

14.98 (6.11)

F(1,35) = 16.56***

Negative Self-evaluation

  

Pre-treatment

8.85 (6.14)

13.68 (6.29)

F(1,37) = 5.90*

Post-treatment

7.78 (6.26)

12.15 (7.23)

F(1,36) = 3.92*

Coping ideas

   

Pre-treatment

14.25 (6.33)

11.89 (7.73)

F(1,37) = 1.09 ns

Post-treatment

17.68 (7.02)

11.94 (6.16)

F(1,38) = 7.60**

Behavior Diary

   

Pre-treatment

18.72 (7.63)

20.50 (6.88)

F(1,32) = .50 ns

Post-treatment

19.21 (7.55)

19.84 (6.49)

F(1,36) = .076 ns

Children's Depression Inventory (DIKJ)

Pre-treatment

11.52 (6.87)

9.91 (6.06)

F(1,42) = .68 ns

Post-treatment

9.71 (9.06)

11.22 (6.80)

F(1,42) = .39 ns

CLINICIAN-COMPLETED SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall functioning

   

Pre-treatment

52.14 (7.84)

53.70 (6.94)

F(1,42) = .49 ns

Post-treatment

61.19 (14.31)

55.43 (5.62

F(1,42) = 3.19 p = .08

  1. Note: * p < .05; ** p < .01: *** p < .001 ns not significant; scores for both groups were compared with one-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) for the primary outcome measure and for all secondary outcome measures