Skip to main content

Table 3 Means, Standard Deviations, Ranges and Australian Norms for Pros-social Functioning (SDQ Pro-social Behavior Scores) and Psychological Well-being (SDQ Total Difficulties Scores) and Number, Percent and Category Classifications for Psychological Well- being and Comparisons with Australian Norms, by Informant

From: A method of assessing the resilience of whole communities of children: An example from rural Australia

Informant

Pro-social Functioning (SDQ Pro-social Behavior scores)1

Psychological Well-being (SDQ Total Difficulties Scores)2

Continuous score data (Possible score range: 0–10)

Continuous score data (Possible score range: 0–40)

Categorical data

Sample M (SD) Range

Australian norms3 M (SD)

Sample M (SD) Range

Australian norms3 M (SD)

Category Classification

Sample N (%) in category

Australian norms3 (% in category)

Difference in category ratings

Parent (n = 168)

8.2 (1.7)

(2–10)

8.3 (1.7)

9.8 (6.8)

(0 – 27)

8.2 (6.1)

Normal:

Borderline:

Abnormal:

118 (70.2)

22 (13.1)

28 (16.7)

82.0

6.0

12.0

χ2 (2) = 19.97,

p < .001

Teacher

(n = 154)

7.6 (2.3)

(1–10)

7.8 (2.1)

6.6 (6.3)

(0–26)

6.5 (6.0)

Normal:

Borderline:

Abnormal:

123 (79.9)

16 (10.4)

15 (9.7)

76.9

6.0

8.5

χ2 (2) = 2.85,

p = .313

Student

(n = 30)

7.6 (1.8)

(3 – 10)

8.0 (1.7)

10.7 (6.0)

(2 – 23)

9.0 (5.6)

Normal:

Borderline:

Abnormal:

23 (76.7)

4 (13.3)

3 (10.0)

86.0

8.2

5.8

χ2 (2) = 2.18,

p = .336

  1. 1Normal scores range = 6 – 10
  2. 2Normal scores range = 0 – 13
  3. 3http://www.sdqinfo.org/norms/AusNorm1.pdf.