Skip to main content

Table 5 Multiple regressions predicting child mental health resilience residuals – for the whole sample, and for low and high adversity groups

From: Resource factors for mental health resilience in early childhood: An analysis with multiple methodologies

 

Parent-reported mental health resilience residuals

Teacher-reported mental health resilience residuals

Time 1 predictor variables

Whole sample

Low adversity

High adversity

Whole sample

Low adversity

High adversity

 

β (n = 474)

β (n = 158)

β (n = 159)

β (n = 474)

β (n = 158)

β (n = 159)

Step 2:

      

   Gender (female)

.02

-.11

.08

.19***

.17*

.21**

   Self-concept

.27***

.27***

.22*

.02

.04

.19#

   Self-control

.14**

.14#

.16#

.18**

.07

.24*

   Child–parent relationship quality

.17***

.22**

.25**

.12**

.13#

.08

   Child-teacher relationship quality

.08*

.25***

-.04

.15**

.24*

-.01

R 2

.25

.34

.26

.18

.19

.21

F

31.00***

15.43***

10.47***

20.71***

7.14***

8.35***

ΔR 2

.25

.34

.26

.11

.12

.15

ΔF

38.20***

19.12***

13.08***

16.28***

5.79***

7.41***

  1. Note. Models predicting parent-reported child mental health resilience residuals included parent-reported self-concept and self-control as predictor variables, and models predicting teacher-reported child mental health resilience residuals included teacher-reported self-concept and self-control as predictor variables. Variable coefficients are standardised regression coefficients (Betas). Step 1 of the model adjusted for the covariate child gender, with the resource variables entered at Step 2.
  2. # p < .10; * p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001.
Back to article page

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health

ISSN: 1753-2000