Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparisons between a nationwide sample of girls charged with violent offences and referred to a pretrial forensic psychiatric examination (n = 25) and their age- and offence-matched male counterparts

From: Do seriously offending girls differ from their age- and offence type-matched male counterparts on psychopathic traits or psychopathy-related background variables?

 

Girls

Boys

Statisticsa

p

Effect size

PCL-YV

 Total score mean (SD)

19.76 (8.52)

20.32 (6.50)

t = −0.261

0.795

d = −0.073

 Factor 1 (interpersonal)

1.56 (2.18)

1.68 (1.86)

t = −0.209

0.835

d = −0.060

 Factor 2 (affective)

4.44 (2.38)

3.24 (2.33)

t = 1.793

0.079

d = 0.518

 Factor 3 (behavioral)

6.44 (2.83)

7.64 (1.87)

t = −1.770

0.083

d = 0.511

 Factor 4 (antisocial)

5.52 (2.62)

6.88 (1.74)

t = −2.164

0.035

d = 0.624

 Total score > 30

3/25 (12.0 %)

3/25 (12.0 %)

#

1.000

NA

 Total score > 25

8/25 (32.0 %)

7/25 (28.0 %)

X2 = 0.095

0.758

φ = −0.044

 Total score > 20

16/25 (64.0 %)

14/25 (56.0 %)

X2 = 0.333

0.564

φ = −0.082

Item mean (SD)

 Impression management

0.44 (0.58)

0.48 (0.51)

t = −0.209

0.795

d = 0.060

 Grandiose sense of self-worth

0.32 (0.56)

0.40 (0.65)

t = 0.469

0.641

d = 0.135

 Stimulation-seeking

1.44 (0.71)

1.92 (0.28)

t = −3.142

0.003

d = 0.907

 Pathological lying

0.32 (0.69)

0.40 (0.76)

t = −0.389

0.699

d = 0.113

 Manipulation for personal gain

0.52 (0.77)

0.36 (0.70)

t = 0.769

0.446

d = 0.222

 Lack of remorse/guilt

1.32 (0.75)

0.92 (0.76)

t = 1.876

0.067

d = 0.542

 Shallow affect

0.88 (0.83)

0.72 (0.69)

t = 0.745

0.460

d = 0.215

 Callous/lack of empathy

1.00 (0.71)

0.72 (0.61)

t = 1.495

0.141

d = 0.432

 Parasitic orientation

0.64 (0.76)

0.84 (0.80)

t = −0.908

0.368

d = 0.262

 Poor anger control

1.36 (0.70)

1.84 (0.37)

t = −3.024

0.004

d = 0.873

 Impersonal sexual behavior

0.80 (0.96)

0.36 (0.64)

t = 1.912

0.062

d = 0.552

 Early problem behavior

1.20 (0.91)

1.68 (0.56)

t = −2.245

0.039

d = 0.648

 Lack of goals

1.52 (0.71)

1.40 (0.76)

t = 0.574

0.569

d = 0.166

 Impulsivity

1.56 (0.71)

1.92 (0.28)

t = −2.357

0.023

d = 0.680

 Irresponsibility

1.28 (0.69)

1.64 (0.57)

t = −2.034

0.048

d = 0.587

 Failure to accept responsibility

1.24 (0.60)

0.88 (0.73)

t = 1.915

0.061

d = 0.553

 Unstable interpersonal relationships

1.00 (0.96)

0.28 (0.61)

t = 3.166

0.003

d = 0.914

 Serious criminal behavior

1.48 (0.51)

1.60 (0.50)

t = −0.840

0.405

d = 0.242

 Serious violation of conditional release

0.48 (0.65)

0.32 (0.48)

t = 0.990

0.327

d = 0.286

 Criminal versatility

1.00 (0.82)

1.48 (0.71)

t = −2.213

0.032

d = 0.639

Background variables

 Childhood (0–12 years) home

  Parents’ divorce

16/25 (64.0 %)

17/24 (70.8 %)

X2 = 0.260

0.610

φ = 0.073

  Mother’s substance use problems

10/25 (40.0 %)

5/25 (20.0 %)

#

0.217

NA

  Father’s substance use problems

14/24 (58.3 %)

17/24 (70.8 %)

X2 = 0.820

0.365

φ = 0.131

  Mother’s psychiatric problems

5/25 (20.0 %)

8/25 (32.0 %)

#

0.520

NA

  Father’s psychiatric problems

3/24 (12.5 %)

6/24 (25.0 %)

#

0.461

NA

  Witnessing physical violence

13/25 (52.0 %)

12/25 (48.0 %)

X2 = 0.080

0.777

φ = −0.400

  Subject of physical violence

15/25 (60.0 %)

9/25 (36.0 %)

X2 = 2.885

0.089

φ = −0.240

  More than four children in the family

11/25 (44.0 %)

9/25 (36.0 %)

X2 = 0.333

0.564

φ = −0.082

  Institutional/foster home placement

7/25 (28.0 %)

10/25 (40.0 %)

X2 = 0.802

0.370

φ = 0.127

 Other childhood (0–12 years) variables

  Subject of sexual abuse

9/25 (36.0 %)

0/25 (0.0 %)

#

0.001

NA

  Mental health contact

8/25 (32.0 %)

9/25 (36.0 %)

X2 = 0.089

0.765

φ = 0.042

  Client of social services

15/25 (60.0 %)

18/25 (72.0 %)

X2 = 0.802

0.370

φ = 0.127

 Criminality of near relatives

  Mother’s criminality

1/25 (4.0 %)

0/25 (0.0 %)

#

1.000

NA

  Father’s criminality

7/24 (28.0 %)

8/24 (32.0 %)

X2 = 0.097

0.755

φ = 0.045

  Delinquent sibling/s

8/25 (32.0 %)

10/25 (40.0 %)

X2 = 0.347

0.556

φ = 0.083

  Homicide history of parents or near relatives

5/25 (20.0 %)

2/25 (8.0 %)

#

0.417

NA

 School performance in primary and secondary schools

  Failure to pass grade at school

14/25 (56.0 %)

14/25 (56.0 %)

X2 = 0.082

0.774

φ = −0.041

  Attending special education

11/25 (44.0 %)

14/25 (56.0 %)

X2 = 0.720

0.396

φ = 0.120

Offence-related variables

 History of previous offending

19/25 (76.0 %)

21/25 (84.0 %)

X2 = 0.500

0.480

φ = 0.100

 History of violent offending

8/25 (32.0 %)

12/25 (48.0 %)

X2 = 1.333

0.246

φ = 0.163

 Current alcohol use disorder

15/25 (60.0 %)

15/25 (60.0 %)

X2 = 0.000

1.000

φ = 0.000

 Intoxicated during index offence

15/25 (60.0 %)

22/25 (88.0 %)

X2 = 5.094

0.024

φ = 0.319

 More than one offender

15/25 (60.0 %)

10/25 (40.0 %)

X2 = 2.000

0.157

φ = −0.200

 More than one victim

3/25 (12.0 %)

5/24 (20.8 %)

#

0.463

NA

 Victim-offender relationship

  Family or (ex-) intimate

9/24 (37.5 %)

0/24 (0.0 %)

#

0.001

NA

  Acquaintance

11/24 (45.8 %)

5/24 (20.8 %)

#

0.062

NA

  Stranger

4/24 (16.7 %)

19/24 (79.2 %)

#

<0.001

NA

  Index offence characterized with instrumental violence

7/25 (28 %)

9/25 (36 %)

X2 = 0.368

0.544

φ = 0.086

  1. Independent samples t test (t), the Chi square test (χ2), and the Fisher’s exact test (#) are used for comparing the groups. Effect sizes are reported: d Cohen’s d, φ = phi
  2. Statistically significant differences are in italics
  3. NA not applicable