Skip to main content

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics, teaching history, and past experience of ADHD between the treatment and control groups

From: Effect of attention-deficit–hyperactivity-disorder training program on the knowledge and attitudes of primary school teachers in Kaduna, North West Nigeria

Variables

Treatment group

(n = 84)

Control group

(n = 75)

t test or χ2

p

Age, mean (SD)

44.81 (9.64)

39.83 (7.68)

4.10

<0.001*

Gender, n (%)

 Male

12 (75.0)

4 (25.0)

3.5

0.06

 Female

72 (50.3)

71 (49.7)

  

Type of school

 Public

58 (52.3)

53 (47.7)

0.05

0.082

 Private

26 (54.2)

22 (45.8)

  

Qualifications

 NCE

57 (52.8)

51 (47.2)

1.5

0.82

 Degree

20 (50.0)

20 (50.0)

  

 PGD

2 (50.0)

2 (50.0)

  

 Grade 2

1 (100.0)

  

 Masters

4 (66.7)

2 (33.3)

  

Class currently taught

 Nursery

10 (50.0)

10 (50.0)

1.0

0.60

 Primary 1–3

36 (49.3)

37 (50.7)

  

 Primary 4–6

38 (57.6)

28 (42.4)

  

Previous education involving ADHD

 Yes

17 (39.5)

26 (60.5)

3.16

0.08Y

 No

65 (57.8)

49 (42.2)

  

Additional training on ADHD

 Yes

14 (58.3)

10 (41.7)

0.3

0.56

 No

70 (51.9)

65 (48.1)

  

Ever taught pupil with ADHD

 Yes

48 (49.5)

47 (50.5)

1.0

0.31

 No

38 (57.6)

28 (42.4)

  

Ever requested ADHD evaluation

 Yes

5 (25.0)

15 (75.0)

5.9

<0.02Y

 No

79 (56.8)

60 (43.2)

  

Does your school employ helpers for pupils with ADHD

 Yes

4 (30.8)

6 (69.2)

2.8

0.10

 No

80 (54.8)

66 (45.2)

  

No of years teaching

15.62 (8.48)

12.83 (7.49)

2.19

0.03*

No of pupils in the class

30.68 (8.78)

44.44 (21.54)

−3.40

<0.001*

No of workshops attended on ADHD

0.14 (0.58)

0.19 (0.51)

−0.50

0.62

Hour of ADHD training had before

0.63 (1.40)

1.03 (2.09)

1.42

0.16

No of articles read on ADHD

0.48 (1.92)

0.41 (1.30)

0.24

0.81

No of students with ADHD ever taught in the past

2.90 (6.51)

6.43 (13.62)

−2.12

<0.04*

  1. YYates correction
  2. * Significant at p < 0.05