Skip to main content

Table 4 Multivariable logistic regression analysis for mental health problems

From: Mental health problems and associated school interpersonal relationships among adolescents in China: a cross-sectional study

Variables

Model 1

Model 2

p

OR (95% CI)

p

OR (95% CI)

Teacher–student relationship

 Intimacy

  Good

–

1

–

1

  Middle

0.096

1.112 (0.981–1.259)

< 0.001

1.490 (1.334–1.664)

  Poor

< 0.001

1.414 (1.219–1.639)

< 0.001

2.175 (1.922–2.460)

 Satisfaction

  Good

–

1

–

1

  Middle

0.429

1.051 (0.929–1.190)

< 0.001

1.299 (1.159–1.456)

  Poor

0.004

1.225 (1.067–1.405)

< 0.001

1.919 (1.711–2.152)

 Support

  Good

–

1

–

1

  Middle

0.064

1.142 (0.992–1.314)

< 0.001

1.680 (1.479–1.908)

  Poor

0.139

1.131 (0.961–1.331)

< 0.001

2.395 (2.093–2.740)

 Conflict

  Low

–

1

–

1

  Middle

< 0.001

1.892 (1.692–2.116)

< 0.001

2.254 (2.024–2.510)

  High

< 0.001

2.757 (2.415–3.148)

< 0.001

3.246 (2.863–3.680)

Peer relationship

 Social-emotional

  Good

–

1

–

1

  Middle

0.517

0.956 (0.835–1.095)

< 0.001

1.493 (1.338–1.666)

  Poor

0.065

0.859 (0.731–1.009)

< 0.001

1.841 (1.636–2.071)

 Communicative interaction

  Good

–

1

–

1

  Middle

0.005

1.227 (1.063–1.415)

< 0.001

1.682 (1.498–1.889)

  Poor

0.059

1.185 (0.994–1.414)

< 0.001

2.127 (1.871–2.418)

 Interpersonal harmony

  Good

–

1

–

1

  Middle

< 0.001

1.462 (1.268–1.687)

< 0.001

1.788 (1.596–2.004)

  Poor

< 0.001

1.926 (1.618–2.293)

< 0.001

2.644 (2.339–2.988)

  1. Model 1 was adjusted for all dimensions of TSRQ and PRS
  2. Model 2 was adjusted for variables in model 1 and gender, age, sibling status, household and family economic status