Skip to main content

Table 5 Major studies with which current study findings have been compared

From: Lived experiences of children and adolescents with obsessive–compulsive disorder: interpretative phenomenological analysis

Authors

Phenomenon

Age group

Sample

Method

Key findings

1. Bhattacharya & Singh, 2015 (India)

Subjective experiences

18–25 years

n = 5

Case study approach & thematic content analysis

Three major categories: ‘Connection vs. Disconnection,’ ‘Feeling of Guilt,’ and ‘Authenticity’ [13]

2. Brooks, 2011 (USA)

Lived experience

 > 35 years

n = 1

Auto-ethnography

Need for individuals to steer themselves among and between ‘appropriate’ performance and secret rituals; emphasis on ‘importance of image management’ [14]

3. Keyes, Nolte and Williams, 2018 (UK)

Lived experiences

13–18 years (mean -15 years 7 months)

n = 10

Thematic analysis

Four themes: Traumatic and stressful life events; responses to signs of OCD; battle of living with OCD and ambivalent relationship to help; need to address stigma and sense of shame [22]

4. Kohler, Coetzee and Lochner, 2018 (South Africa)

Subjective experiences

18 years or older (mean -45.65 years)

n = 20

Thematic analysis

Three core themes identified—realisation of OCD; disruptions to daily life; and managing the disruptions to daily life [35]

5. Murphy & Perera-Delcourt, 2014 (UK)

Lived experiences

22–53 years

n = 9

IPA

Two major themes: ‘having OCD’ & ‘impact of therapy’ [38]

6. Olson, Vera & Perez, 2007 (Hawaii)

Lived experiences

30–62 years

n = 10

Data analysis by Consensual Qualitative Research

Main themes—Symptoms and meaning, care and treatment, coping and independent living, connectedness [39]

7. Pedley et al., 2019 (UK)

Illness perceptions

16 years or older (2 were between 16–24 years and 14 subjects were above 24 years)

n = 16

Thematic analysis

Recognition of symptoms affected by failure to interpret experiences as ‘symptoms’. Participants tried to decrease its consequences by concealing symptoms [41]

8. Robinson, Rose and Salkovskis, 2017 (UK)

Enablers and barriers to seeking treatment

21–57 years (mean -36 years)

n = 17

Thematic analysis

Barriers -stigma; internal factors (not knowing the problem); treatment-related factors/general practitioner-related factors (GP); & fear of criminalisation. Positive enablers -support to seek help; information regarding OCD in media; confidence in GP. Negative enablers were crisis; feeling driven to seek treatment due to nature of content (thoughts) [45]