Table 4 Results of the models predicting youth resilience and well-being (n = 92)

Model 2

 Pandemic-related stress

− 0.11 (0.11)

.330

− 0.14 (0.11)

.195

− 0.18 (0.09)

.035

− 0.20 (0.09)

.030

 Support (dichotomous)

0.92 (0.20)

.000

0.11 (0.15)

.456

0.70 (0.34)

.040

0.16 (0.15)

.268

 Support (continuous)

1.14 (0.20)

.000

0.53 (0.13)

.000

0.84 (0.24)

.015

0.33 (0.14)

.022

 Living situation

− 0.25 (0.10)

.011

− 0.24 (0.10)

.016

− 0.27 (0.11)

.017

− 0.27 (0.11)

.019

 Treatment condition

0.35 (0.12)

.003

0.36 (0.12)

.002

0.27 (0.12)

.019

0.26 (0.12)

.033

 Gender

–

–

–

–

− 0.43 (0.12)

.000

− 0.40 (0.13)

.002

Model 3

 Pandemic-related stress

− 0.11 (0.11)

.333

− 0.14 (0.10)

.174

− 0.18 (0.09)

.035

− 0.20 (0.09)

.029

 Support (dichotomous)

0.90 (0.20)

.000

0.08 (0.15)

.598

0.70 (0.34)

.040

0.16 (0.14)

.270

 Support (continuous)

1.11 (0.19)

.000

0.52 (0.13)

.000

0.84 (0.35)

.015

0.33 (0.15)

.022

 Stress × Support (continuous)

0.06 (0.07)

.413

0.19 (0.09)

.029

− 0.01 (0.07)

.934

0.01 (0.07)

.863

 Living situation

− 0.25 (0.10)

.013

− 0.24 (0.10)

.017

− 0.27 (0.11)

.016

− 0.27 (0.11)

.020

 Treatment condition

0.35 (0.11)

.002

0.36 (0.11)

.001

0.27 (0.12)

.019

0.26 (0.12)

.032

 Gender

–

–

–

–

− 0.41 (0.13)

.001

− 0.40 (0.13)

.002