Longitudinal association between interparental conflict and risk-taking behavior among Chinese adolescents: testing a moderated mediation model

Table 2 Summary of the direct and indirect effects

Direct and indirect effects	Bias-corrected bootstrapped estimates for the effects
Direct and indirect effects	b	SE	95% CI	β
Direct pathway
T1 Interparental conflict → T3 Risk-taking behavior	.05	.03	[.003, .108]	.09
Indirect pathways
T1 Interparental conflict → T2 Deviant peer affiliation → T3 Risk-taking behavior	.02	.01	[.008, .046]	.04

T1 = Time 1, T2 = Time 2, T3 = Time 3; The significant results are in bold. According to Preacher and Kelley [71], standardized indirect effects around 0.01 were “small”, effects around 0.09 were “medium”, and effect around 0.25 were “large”. b = unstandardized coefficient, SE = standard error, CI = confidence interval for the standardized coefficient, β = standardized coefficient

ISSN: 1753-2000