Resilient phenotypes among bereaved youth: a comparison of trajectory, relative, and cross-domain approaches

Table 4 Predictive validity of resilience constructs with MFQ at 17.5

Model	Coefficient	Beta	SE	P-value	Model R²
MFQ ~ relative psychological resilience + covariates	Relative resilience, SDQ	− 0.19	0.04	< 0.001	0.07
MFQ ~ relative psychological resilience (adjusted) + covariates	Relative resilience, SDQ (adjusted)	− 0.19	0.04	< 0.001	0.07
MFQ ~ cross-domain relative resilience 8 + covariates	Cross-domain relative resilience, 8 domains	− 0.06	0.01	< 0.001	0.06
MFQ ~ cross-domain relative resilience 7 + covariates	Cross-domain relative resilience, 7 domains	− 0.05	0.01	< 0.001	0.05
MFQ ~ class assignment + covariates	LGMM class assignment: worsening class vs. low/stable class	0.43	0.15	< 0.01	0.06
MFQ ~ class assignment + covariates	LGMM class assignment: elevated class vs. low/stable class	0.51	0.15	< 0.001	0.06

Each model regresses MFQ total score (square root transformed due to high skew) on the specified resilience construct and the following covariates: child’s sex (female vs. male), child’s life events score between 5 and 7, maternal financial difficulties at 32 weeks of gestation, paternal and maternal educational attainment, maternal smoking status around birth (yes vs. no), and Townsend deprivation index quintiles

ISSN: 1753-2000