Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 8 Principle Components analysis of parent rated SDQ scores in a community sample of 3 – 17 year old Chinese children (N = 1965)

From: The validity, reliability and normative scores of the parent, teacher and self report versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in China

Total Variance Explained Component 1 "Prosocial" 17.2% Component 2 "Hyper/Innatt" 9.4% Component 3 "Emotional" 7.5% Component 4 "Conduct 1" 5.6% Component 5 "Conduct 2" 4.6%
(Question number) Question      
(1) Considerate .524 -.306    
(4)Shares .565     
(9)Helpful .681     
(17)Kind to kids .632     
(20)Helps out .655     
(2)Restless   .486   .571  
(10)Fidgeting   .501   .522  
(15)Distractible   .722    
(21)Reflective   .684    
(25)Persistent   .729    
(3)Somatic    .334   .359
(8)Worries    .567   
(13)Unhappy    .520 .462  
(16)Clingy    .684   
(24)Fears    .686   
(5)Tempers     .736  
(7)Obedient     .428  
(12)Fights -.392    .479 .368
(18)Argues with adults      .678
(22)Spiteful      .514
(6)Solitary    .584   
(11)Good friend -.375     
(14)Popular -.577     
(19)Bullied      .602
(23)Best with adults      
  1. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.
  2. Rotation converged in 7 iterations.