Skip to main content

Table 2 Model fit indices of cross-lagged structural models and model comparisons for nested models

From: Reciprocal relationships between self-esteem, coping styles and anxiety symptoms among adolescents: between-person and within-person effects

Models

Fit statistics

Difference tests of relative fit

S-B χ2

df

p

CFI

TLI

RSMEA

90% CI

SMRS

Model comparison

DS-B χ2 (df)a

Dp

Scaling correction factor

1. Conventional cross-lagged panel model with freely estimated paths

152.602

9

< 0.001

0.964

0.867

0.090

0.078–0.103

0.031

   

1.309

2. Random intercept cross-lagged panel model with freely estimated paths

4.991

3

0.172

1.000

0.995

0.018

0.000–0.046

0.008

2 vs. 1

140.033 (6)

< 0.001

1.156

3. Both contemporaneous and cross-lagged paths are constrained to be equal (= no change over time)

20.696

15

0.147

0.999

0.997

0.014

0.000–0.027

0.015

3 vs. 2

15.737 (12)

0.204

1.192

4 Models with auto-regressive paths are constrained to be equal

 a. Self-esteem paths

4.766

4

0.312

1.000

0.999

0.010

0.000–0.037

0.008

4a vs. 2

0.006 (1)

0.939

1.212

 b. Coping styles paths

5.198

4

0.268

1.000

0.998

0.012

0.000–0.038

0.008

4b vs. 2

0.187 (1)

0.665

1.151

 c. Anxiety symptoms paths

5.150

4

0.272

1.000

0.998

0.012

0.000–0.038

0.008

4c vs. 2

0.456 (1)

0.500

1.259

5. Select optimal model: reciprocal model with constrained auto-regressive paths and constrained cross-lagged paths

21.960

18

0.234

0.999

0.998

0.011

0.000–0.024

0.016

5 vs. 2

17.061 (15)

0.315

1.228

6. Controlling for covariates based on Model 5

142.532

78

< 0.001

0.989

0.982

0.021

0.015–0.026

0.027

   

1.115

7. Gender difference

 a. Unconstrained model

71.359

48

0.016

0.994

0.991

0.025

0.011–0.037

0.035

   

1.245

 b. Constrained model

128.921

60

< 0.001

0.983

0.980

0.038

0.029–0.048

0.074

7b vs. 7a

62.900 (12)

< 0.001

1.209

  1. CFI comparative fit index, TLI Tucker–Lewis Fit Index, RSMEA Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, 90% CI 90% confidence interval of the RSMEA, D represents the comparisons of the model fit indexes of S-B χ2 and df
  2. aChi-square difference calculated using the Satorra–Bentler Scale Chi-square difference test