Skip to main content

Table 2 Model fit and comparison for measurement invariance

From: Vicious cycle of emotion regulation and ODD symptoms among Chinese school-age children with ODD: a random intercept cross-lagged panel model

Variable

Models

χ2 (df)

CFI

SRMR

RMSEA

â–³CFI

â–³RMSEA

Teacher ratings

ODD symptoms

 

Configural invariance

3.997 (48)

0.977

0.064

0.066

–

–

 

Metric invariance

4.814 (62)

0.972

0.068

0.075

−0.005

0.009

 

Scalar invariance

5.433 (78)

0.964

0.068

0.080

−0.008

0.005

Emotion regulation

 

Configural invariance

1.567 (51)

0.971

0.045

0.029

–

–

 

Metric invariance

1.443 (65)

0.971

0.050

0.026

0.000

−0.003

 

Scalar invariance

1.466 (81)

0.962

0.051

0.026

−0.009

0.000

Emotion lability/negativity

 

Configural invariance

0.000 (0)

1.000

0.006

0.033

–

–

 

Metric invariance

0.673 (4)

1.000

0.006

0.033

0.000

0.000

 

Scalar invariance

2.043 (10)

0.995

0.006

0.034

−0.005

0.001

Parents ratings

ODD symptoms

 

Configural invariance

165.114 (48)

0.939

0.038

0.053

–

–

 

Metric invariance

193.858 (62)

0.931

0.039

0.051

−0.008

−0.002

 

Scalar invariance

222.833 (78)

0.923

0.040

0.048

−0.008

−0.003

Emotion regulation

 

Configural invariance

73.572 (51)

0.964

0.043

0.052

–

–

 

Metric invariance

87.333 (65)

0.962

0.054

0.045

−0.002

−0.007

 

Scalar invariance

89.273 (81)

0.962

0.062

0.044

0.000

−0.001

Emotion lability/negativity

 

Configural invariance

0.000 (0)

1.000

0.030

0.028

–

–

 

Metric invariance

8.491 (4)

0.992

0.030

0.020

−0.008

−0.008

 

Scalar invariance

13.177 (10)

0.995

0.030

0.013

0.003

−0.007

  1. CFI = Comparative Fit Index; RMSEA = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; SRMR = Standardized Root Mean Square Residual