Skip to main content

Table 2 Proportions of perceived high/ very high pandemic-related restrictions and burden calculated by Chi Squared Tests

From: Easing pandemic-related restrictions, easing psychosocial stress factors in families with infants and toddlers? Cross-sectional results of the three wave CoronabaBY study from Germany

Kind of restriction/change

Wave I (Feb. 21-June 21)

Wave II (June 21-Oct. 21)

Wave III (Oct. 21-March 22)

Wave I versus Wave II

Wave II versus Wave III

Wave I versus Wave III

% (n)

Statistical significance b (Effect size φ)

Participants perceiving a high/very high level of restrictionsa related to…

 Parent social contacts

75.1 (754)

32.6 (306)

41.1 (410)

* (−0.426)

* (0.088)

* (−0.345)

 Child social contacts

63.6 (638)

27.4 (275)

30.7 (307)

* (−0.362)

n.s. (0.037)

* (−0.328)

 Family support services

74.8 (751)

55.7 (523)

58.6 (585)

* (−0.200)

n.s. (0.029)

* (−0.172)

 Leisure activities

93.3 (937)

59.3 (557)

68.1 (680)

* (−0.403)

* (0.091)

* (−0.320)

Participants perceiving a high/very high level of pandemic-related changesa

 Changes in childcare situation

42.3 (425)

28.6 (268)

25.1 (251)

* (−0.144)

n.s. (−0.039)

* (−0.182)

 Increased family conflicts

16.5 (165)

15.6 (147)

16.1 (161)

n.s. ( 0.010)

n.s. (0.006)

n.s. (−0.004)

 Worries about COVID- Infections

47.7 (479)

34.4 (320)

55.7 (555)

* (−0.138)

* (0.216)

* (−0.079)

 Overall perceived pandemic burden

% (n)

Statistical significance (Effect size φ)

Participants perceiving the pandemic as stressful/ very stressfula

 Parent

65.3 (656)

57.5 (539)

62.2 (621)

* (−0.082)

n.s. (0.049)

n.s. (−0.032)

 Child (parent report)

36.3 (365)

34.5 (323)

35.0 (350)

n.s. (−0.02)

n.s. (0.007)

n.s. (0.013)

  1. *p ≤ 0.05
  2. aBased on responding options 4 and 5 on a 5-point-Likert scale, badjusted for children’s age and sex. Effect size φ: < 0.01 indicates a small effect, 0.3 a medium effect and 0.5 a large effect