Skip to main content

Table 6 Regression summaries of proportional difference affective control scores predicting mental health and well-being outcomes for young people in care, controlling for age, gender and IQ in the first step

From: Cognitive and affective control for adolescents in care versus their peers: implications for mental health

 

∆F

df

∆R2

B

β

t

Internalising symptoms

0.42

4, 42

0.03

   

 DS accuracy

   

−0.06

−0.01

−0.03

 ES happy incongruent RT

   

−5.00

−0.18

−1.25

 ES sad incongruent RT

   

0.03

0.00

0.01

 ASS accuracy

   

−0.15

−0.02

−0.10

Externalising symptoms

0.48

4, 42

0.04

   

 DS accuracy

   

−0.01

−0.00

−0.01

 ES happy incongruent RT

   

−3.52

−0.13

−0.89

 ES sad incongruent RT

   

−1.41

−0.06

−0.40

 ASS accuracy

   

1.45

0.15

0.95

PTSD symptoms

1.56

4, 42

0.09

   

 DS accuracy

   

2.84

0.06

0.46

 ES happy incongruent RT

   

−16.13

−0.16

−1.29

 ES sad incongruent RT

   

−15.86

−0.18

−1.43

 ASS accuracy

   

5.72

0.16

1.18

School well-being

0.72

4, 42

0.05

   

 DS accuracy

   

0.97

0.04

0.31

 ES happy incongruent RT

   

9.29

0.20

1.43

 ES sad incongruent RT

   

−5.58

−0.13

−0.97

 ASS accuracy

   

−1.45

−0.08

−0.58

  1. DS digit span, ES emotional Stroop, RT reaction time, ASS affective set shifting
  2. *p < 0.05
  3. **p < 0.01
  4. ***p < 0.001