Open Access

Body image drawings dissociate ethnic differences and anorexia in adolescent girls

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health201711:13

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-017-0150-y

Received: 13 May 2016

Accepted: 21 February 2017

Published: 14 March 2017

Abstract

Objectives

To distinguish between ethnic differences among segregated schoolgirls and restrictive anorexia nervosa using a simple culture-fair test of body image (BI) figure drawings.

Methods

Several responses to BI figure drawings by 178 adolescent schoolgirls from three ethnically distinct and segregated schools and communities in Israel, Jewish secular (JS), Jewish Haredi (H), and Christian Arab (C), and a group of 14 severely restricting anorexic girls (AN). BI evaluations were analyzed by MANCOVA, followed by paired or Student-t tests for comparisons between responses and groups respectively. Pearson r served for correlations and the Fisher Z for differences between slopes.

Results

Despite the total ethnic segregation among the schoolgirls, there are commonalities; all prefer a thinner ideal BI, and are similarly dissatisfied with their BI. However, ethnic differences also emerge: C underestimate their BI and how others view them, and H true and Ideal BI evaluations correlate, unlike the other groups. Despite this variability, and in stark contrast, the anorexic girls show a gross misperception of their BI, even in comparison to girls equated for BMI.

Discussion

The findings show that figure drawings evaluation of BI is a simple and robust instrument dissociating clinical and ethnic responses. Clinicians may consider body figure drawings as a simple, supportive, diagnostic for first-line recognition for risk of AN in adolescent girls.

Keywords

Adolescent girls Anorexia nervosa Body image dissatisfaction Body image figure drawings Ethnic differences

Background

Eating disorders (ED) are among the most common psychiatric disorders in young women. “A registered dietician may be the first to recognize an individual’s ED symptoms or be the first health care professional consulted by a patient for this condition” [1] and “early identification is crucial because shorter duration of illness is associated with improved outcome in ED” [2]. “the presentation of eating disorders is often cryptic—for example, via physical symptoms in primary care. The ability to diagnose the condition varies and can be inadequate, and existing questionnaires for detection are lengthy and may require specialist interpretation” [3]. The 5-question SCOFF is intended for non-specialist use but its utility for the general population and specifically for adolescents is uncertain [4, 5]. Hence, simple diagnostic aids are continually sought.

In multi-ethnic communities it is often helpful to distinguish between cultural norms and potential diagnostic features, particularly because cultural factors influence body weight norms, weight control, obesity, and body image (BI), body image dissatisfaction, and consequently may both obscure or increase vulnerability for ED [618]. At the same time in anorexia nervosa (AN), BI dissatisfaction is an essential diagnostic and together with the drive for thinness is extreme and underlies and perpetuates the psychopathology [8, 15, 19, 20].

Women, especially adolescent, are more likely to experience BI concerns [2, 7, 9, 18, 21, 22]. Social norms of feminine beauty, particularly western norms of shape and body weight are consistently correlated with increased weight consciousness and risk of ED [1416, 21, 23, 24]. However, most studies of ethnic differences in risk factors for ED have examined largely intermingled ethnicities, often in the same institution, exposed to similar media, and with little segregation. In addition, questionnaires used across cultures, often in translation, may not be understood as intended [12].

In Israel, distinct ethnic communities have been studied in relation to propensity for ED. Indigenous Moslem, Druze, Circassian, Christian and Bedouin schoolgirls, as a group in the north of Israel, score higher on ED questionnaires than their Jewish peers, while within the group Circassians score lower and Bedouin higher. Among the Jews, Kibbutz girls scored higher in one study, but not another, and religious girls lower. Such differences are often attributed to socio-cultural traits, ‘modernity’. and exposure to western media [68, 1316, 19, 24].

What makes Israel multi-ethnicity different, and somewhat unique, is the complete segregation of different cultural groups often in adjacent habitation. Ethnic and religious identities may be profoundly segregated by residential area, education (schools and colleges separated by ethnic and religious makeup and teaching programs), language, degree of traditionality and religiosity, exposure to different mass media or none at all, basic values and attitudes toward femininity, sex roles, marriage and divorce, family relations, child-rearing, dietary restrictions, and more [7, 1217]. Such profound demarcations may place an even greater onus on ED tests to reliably distinguish between the cultural and clinical. Thus, in 10 distinct groups of Israeli schoolgirls, EAT-26 subscales in at least 3 of the groups overlapped with AN scores [15].

Hence it is of interest to enquire whether segregated ethnicities differ in BI perception, whether such differences can be evaluated without recourse to language and translation, and whether such differences might overlap and compromise clinical evaluation of BI distortion [8]. Thus, tests that can screen for risk of ED, are robust across ethnicities and culture-fair, are of interest, especially if simple and brief [5, 8, 13].

Here we examined the robustness of a simple instrument (body image figure drawings [23]) to distinguish between cultural and clinical differences in evaluating BI. We compared three groups of ethnically diverse and segregated schoolgirls, and a group of severely restricting adolescent AN girls. Christian Arab girls (C) and Jewish secular girls (JS) differ in cultural, traditional, and religious content and norms, access distinct media differing in language (Arabic and Hebrew), with the Arabs tending to the more traditional. Jewish Haredi girls (H) also differ in language, using both Yiddish and Hebrew, are deeply religious and traditional, and are totally isolated from media (radio, TV, theatre, film, internet, non-sectarian magazines and newspapers, and books (other than scriptures)], and State educational programs [10, 12, 13].1

The three groups are entirely separated in and out of school and have negligible or no knowledge of each other.

Among Arab girls, Christians score lower on ED symptoms, but score higher than Jewish girls [7, 12, 17]. Among Jewish girls, the Orthodox score lower, and their self-esteem relates positively to religious fervor and negatively to ED scores, the authors suggesting that religiosity provides protection from ED [13, 25]. Haredis are considerably more religious, traditional, and segregated than the Orthodox Jewish stream, possibly predicting even lower ED scores for the H girls [9, 10].

Such differences are often attributed to socio-cultural traits and exposure to western media [7, 1118, 24], although there have been few empirical studies relating specific cultural traits and ED [18, 24].

Our aim was to examine whether a simple test would distinguish the marked ethnic differences between these three groups and to what extent they might overlap those of AN.

Methods

Participants

Ethics approval was obtained from the Ministry of Education and the School Head for the schoolgirls. Girls and parents signed informed consent forms sent from the school. No incentives were offered. The researchers explained the selection criteria to the School Head: grade, sex (girls—Haredi schools are not mixed), no ED prior or current, and no weight change greater than 5 kg in the previous 6 months. The Head scheduled the classes for the study, and in effect, all the girls in the selected classes volunteered. Testing was carried out by two research assistants in Hebrew or Arabic. The schoolgirls completed the questionnaire with the figure drawings at their desks in the classroom. Subsequently, in a separate room, individually, they were weighed and height measured. To reduce the possibility of ED, schoolgirls reporting weight changes greater than 5 kg in the previous 6 months, or who were currently counselled by a clinical dietitian, were excluded (6 girls).

For AN, ethics approval was obtained from their hospital and the university. Parents and daughters gave informed consent and permission for access to relevant medical information which included BMI, because we did not weigh or measure height to avoid stress. In addition, to circumvent the possible conflictual nature of the AN-therapist relation, we emphasized to the participants that our researchers were not involved in their treatment, and were from an unrelated university (in Haifa, a different town). To minimize variability in diagnosis, treatment regimen, and environment, we enlisted participants from the same closed ward, in their first episode, and similarly diagnosed with restrictive anorexia with no comorbidities. Girls were tested within 2.9 ± 0.1 day of hospitalization to minimize entrenchment of AN behavior patterns often acquired from veteran AN patients, and prior to any recovery. Drug therapy commenced at intake and included olanzapine, amisulpride, or risperidone. Fourteen girls meeting the criteria were enrolled, 3 refused. They completed the BI questionnaire with the figure drawings individually in a separate room [20]. No incentive was offered but after the tests an unanticipated token gift of a necklace (value ~$4) was offered in appreciation.

Participant group size, age and BMI are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Participant data (±SD)

 

Age (years)

BMI

n

Restrictive anorexic (AN)

16.0 ± 1.1*

17.3 ± 1.8*

14

Jewish Secular (JS)

14.2 ± 1.3

19.4 ± 3.9

81

Christian Arab (C)

14.9 ± 0.4

22.1 ± 2.9*

37

Haredi (H)

14.5 ± 1.3

20.1 ± 3.3

60

Different from other groups, * p’s < 0.05–0.001

Body image evaluation

Using 7 different schematic figure drawings of girls [23], participants marked a continuous linear scale below the images in response to each of 3 questions: (1) the image “most like you”, (2) their “ideal body shape”, and (3) “which figure would others consider most like you” (in Hebrew, or verbally in Arabic).

Statistical analysis

For analysis, scores were converted to age-corrected BMI in the 3rd–97th percentiles (BMI%) (26). BI Dissatisfaction was calculated as the difference between questions 1 and 2. BI evaluations were analyzed by MANCOVA with BMI% and age as covariates, followed by paired or Student-t test for comparisons between responses and groups respectively (SPSS 19). Dissatisfaction was separately evaluated by univariate analysis because it is not independent of the questions.

Means are presented with standard deviation, and effect size is the partial eta squared (PES). Pearson r served for correlations and the Fisher Z for differences between slopes.

Results

MANCOVA for the 4 groups and 3 questions with BMI% and age covariates shows a group effect, F (9558)=4.3, p < 0.001, PES = 0.065, due to question 1, “most like you”, F (3186) = 10.8, p < 0.001, PES = 0.149, and 3, “others consider most like you”, F (3186) = 8.8, p < 0.001, PES = 0.124. The girls do not differ in their thinner Ideal (Table 2). Univariate analysis with BMI% and age covariates for dissatisfaction shows a group effect, F (3187) = 2.9, p < 0.05, PES = 0.045, due to AN more dissatisfied than schoolgirls, whereas it does not differ among schoolgirls. However, 1-sample tests show that all are dissatisfied with their BI (p’s < 0.001. Table 2).
Table 2

BI self-evaluation expressed as BMI% compared to true BMI%

 

True BMI%

Question 1. Most like you

Question 2. Ideal shape

Question 3. Others consider most like you

Dissatisfaction (questions 1–2)

AN

15.3 ± 15.6

58.8 ± 17.1***

30.4 ± 12.0*

55.4 ± 20.0***

28.4 ± 28.5

JS

52.1 ± 26.2

50.5 ± 15.3

41.9 ± 11.7***

47.1 ± 20.9

8.7 ± 17.1

C

66.7 ± 26.9

50.6 ± 17.0***

39.5 ± 12.6***

48.4 ± 18.0***

11.1 ± 16.5

H

48.4 ± 29.8

51.0 ± 17.0

39.1 ± 12.2*

48.3 ± 20.0

11.8 ± 16.2

Thin

10.13 ± 6.3

34.1 ± 15.3++

38.0 ± 13.6+

31.4 ± 15.9++

−3.9 ± 14.7+++

Responses to a series of schematic body image drawings thin to obese

AN anorexics, JS Jewish secular, C Christian Arab, H Haredi, schoolgirls

Differ from true BMI%: * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001

Thin schoolgirls matched to AN for BMI%. AN differ from Thin: + p < 0.05,++ p < 0.005,+++ p < 0.001. Thin girl evaluations also diverge significantly from true BMI% (not indicated)

For a detailed analysis of trends between the groups we compared slopes of BI scores. Self-estimation of body size correlates with BMI% in groups JS, C and H but not in AN. Ideal preference correlates with BMI% only in H, and dissatisfaction correlates with BMI% in schoolgirl groups (p’s < 0.001) but not in AN, who are more dissatisfied (Fig. 1; Table 2).
Fig. 1

BMI% estimates by the girls for each of the 3 questions against ‘true’ BMI%

Left panel: body size estimates correlate for the schoolgirls (JS, 0.61, C, 0.70, H, 0.67, p’s < 0.001) but not for AN. AN differ from the other slopes (Fisher Z, JS = −2.06, C-2.33, H = −2.33, p’s < 0.05). Center panel: ideal estimates correlate significantly only for H (0.33, p = 0.01). Slopes do not differ significantly. Right panel, dissatisfaction with own BI (difference between questions 1 and 2). Dissatisfaction correlates for the schoolgirls, (JS, 0.45, C, 0.58, H, 0.46, p’s < 0.001), but not for AN (0.08). The slopes do not differ. Horizontal reference line denotes ‘no Dissatisfaction’ and below it—‘Satisfaction’.

Finally, to isolate any effect of low BMI we directly compared AN responses with 29 schoolgirls selected for BMI% <25 (‘Thin’). MANCOVA for the 2 groups and 3 questions with BMI% and age as covariates shows a group effect F (3,37) = 4.6, p < 0.01, PES = 0.273, due to group effects on question 1, “most like you”, F (1,39) = 9.1, p < 0.005, PES = 0.189, question 2, “Ideal shape”, F (1,39) = 4.3, p < 0.05, PES = 0.099, and questions 3, “others consider most like you”, F (1,39) = 10.7, p < 0.005, PES = 0.215 (Table 2). Univariate ANOVA confirmed that Dissatisfaction differs between AN and Thin, F (1,39) = 13.5, p < 0.001, PES = 0.257, because Thin girls are not dissatisfied with their BI (Table 2). Like the other schoolgirls, Thin girl evaluations diverge significantly from true BMI% (data not shown).

Discussion

In comparing 3 groups of schoolgirls we find that despite substantive ethnic differences, BI evaluations are similar: Ideal shape is thinner than true BMI%, and dissatisfaction significant.

Ethnic differences in BI evaluations also emerged. Although C slightly underestimate their BI, show a greater disparity between true BMI%, and their thinner Ideal, and believe that others see them as thinner than they are, this might be an artefact of their greater BMI. Traditional Arab society viewed plumpness as desirable [12, 15], but we doubt that these girls were still influenced because their Ideal is similar to that of their peers, and they are equally dissatisfied, suggesting that their greater disparity between true BMI%, and their thinner Ideal reflects an adaptive BI. Our finding that C do not differ in body dissatisfaction from JS and other ethnic groups is supported by assessments using the EDI-2 [7, 12], although there were higher scores among the Arab girls in other ED-2 subscales that were suggested to be due to Arab women’s stressors and difficulties in a patriarchal community rather than specific eating or thinness ideals [17].

The correlation of BMI% and Ideal preference in H is not found in the other groups. Although like the other girls their ideal was thinner, and dissatisfaction similar, the correlation suggests that the thinner ideal was determined by their own BI, i.e. each girl would like to be thinner in relation to her own BI rather than to an externally determined ideal (as by media exposure, to which H are not exposed). Conversely, because the ideal for the other schoolgirls is unrelated to their BI, it may derive from an external, consensual ideal, consistent with the belief that media exposure contributes to the desire for thinness by its incessant portrayal as beauty [6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 18, 21, 22, 24].

Haredi women conform to strict dress codes, almost uniform clothing concealing arms and legs in public, and wigs to conceal hair or their shaved head. The religious rationale is to minimize attraction to men, and may therefore also diminish the importance of BI [10]. Along with media isolation, religion, and culture, this may account for less ED in this and other traditional communities [7, 10, 13, 16, 25].

In stark contrast, AN show a gross misperception of their BI. Unlike the healthy schoolgirls, there is no relationship between dissatisfaction and BMI percentile among AN (r = 0.08, Fig. 1 right panel) [1921] who are thus dissatisfied with their BI irrespective of its true dimensions. We now show that, again, unlike the schoolgirls, this misperception extends to believing that others also see them as much bigger than they are. As repeatedly reported and we confirm here, they overestimate their size, are clearly dissatisfied with their BI, and their Ideal is thinner [8, 19, 20, 22].

Finally, a direct comparison with equally thin, but healthy, schoolgirls confirms the clear difference in BI evaluation. A thin healthy girl has positive body satisfaction, and her ideal is only slightly heavier than how she sees herself. This is important because it suggests that body figure drawings might be a simple instrument to help first-line clinicians recognize adolescent girl patients presenting with, eg, weight loss and high BI dissatisfaction, at risk for ED.

Limitations of the study

The AN group was small because of the difficulty of finding AN homogenous by age, diagnosis (severely restricted) and recency of hospitalization, as our AN participants were. Ethnically they were Jewish secular, however, in all measures they clearly differed from the healthy JS, C and H schoolgirls including those matched for BMI. AN were also older but the differences survived statistical adjustment for age.

Conclusions

We show that BI evaluation with figure drawings, while sensitive to ethnic differences, is robust across adolescent girls of segregated ethnicities and media exposure. On the other hand, the test clearly distinguishes between ethnic variation and restrictive anorexia nervosa.

Clinicians may consider body figure drawings for simple first-line recognition and referral for risk of AN in adolescent girls.

Although these preliminary results are suggestive, validation by extensive prospective studies would be of interest.

Footnotes
1

Jews (including Haredis) are ~80% of the population, Christian Arabs ~0.016%, and Haredis ~9.9%.

Statistical abstract of Israel 2010. Demographic characteristics. Population, by population group, religion, sex and age http://www.cbs.gov.il/reader/shnaton/templ_shnaton_e.html?num_tab=st02_19&CYear=2010. Accessed 02 April 2016.

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Demographics of Israel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Israel#Ethnic_and_religious_groups. Accessed 02 April 2016.

 

Abbreviations

AN: 

anorexia nervosa

BI: 

body image

C: 

Christian

ED: 

eating disorder

JS: 

Jewish secular

H: 

Haredi

BMI%: 

BMI percentile by age

PES: 

partial eta squared

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

Both authors contributed equally to planning the research, writing the paper, statistical analysis and interpretation of the data. Both authors approved the submitted manuscript. GGK carried out the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Noga David, Raneen Hashoul, Zimratya Duchan, Riki Shotten, Shani Wilman, Limor Ganor; Ruthi Leyder and Navit Greydi for their invaluable help in the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent to publish

We obtained consent to publish from the participant and from her legal parent or guardian to report individual patient data anonymously.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was obtained from the Ministry of Education for the schoolgirls and for AN from their hospital and the university. Girls and parents signed informed consent forms.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Nutrition Unit, Department of Diabetes, Haifa and Western Galilee, Clalit Health Services, Lin Medical Center
(2)
Department of Psychology, University of Haifa

References

  1. Ozier AD, Henry BW. American Dietetic Association. Position of the American Dietetic Association: nutrition intervention in the treatment of eating disorders. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111:1236–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Golden NH, Katzman DK, Sawyer SM, Ornstein RM, Rome ES, Garber AK, Kohn M, Kreipe RE. Position Paper of the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine: medical management of restrictive eating disorders in adolescents and young adults. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56:121–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Morgan JF, Fiona R, Lacey JH. The SCOFF questionnaire a new screening tool for eating disorders. West J Med. 2000;172:164–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Hansson E, Daukantaité D, Johnsson P. SCOFF in a general Swedish adolescent population. J Eat Disord. 2015;3:48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Solmi F, Hatch SL, Hotopf M, Treasure J, Micali N. Validation of the SCOFF questionnaire for eating disorders in a multiethnic general population sample. Int J Eat Disord. 2015;48(3):312–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Keel PK, Klump KL. Are eating disorders culture bound syndromes? Implications for conceptualizing their etiology. Psychol Bull. 2003;129:747–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Latzer Y, Witztum E. Stein. Eating disorders and disordered eating in Israel: an updated review. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2008;16:361–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. White MA, Grilo CM. Ethnic differences in the prediction of eating and body image disturbances among female adolescent psychiatric inpatients. Int J Eat Disord. 2005;38:78–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gluck ME, Geliebter A. Racial/ethnic differences in body image and eating behaviors. Eat Behav. 2002;3:143–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gluck ME, Geliebter A. Body image and eating behaviors in Orthodox and Secular Jewish women. J Gend Specif Med. 2002;5:19–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans P, McConnell A. Do racial minorities respond in the same way to mainstream beauty standards? Social comparison processes in Asian, Black, and White women. Self Identity. 2003;2:153–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Latzer Y, Tzischinsky O, Azaiza F. Disordered eating related behaviors among Arab schoolgirls in Israel: an epidemiological study. Int J Eat Disord. 2007;40:263–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Latzer Y, Orna T, Gefen S. Level of religiosity and disordered eating psychopathology among modern-orthodox Jewish adolescent girls in Israel. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2007;19:511–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Safir MP, Flaisher-Kellner S, Rosenmann A. When gender differences surpass cultural differences in personal satisfaction with body shape in Israeli College Students. Sex Roles. 2005;52:369–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Apter A, Abu Shah M, Iancu I, Abramovitch H, Weizman A, Tyano S. Cultural effects on eating attitudes in Israeli subpopulations and hospitalized anorectics. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 1994;120:83–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Latzer Y, Azaiza F, Tzischinsky O. Eating attitudes and dieting behavior among religious subgroups of Israeli-Arab adolescent females. J Relig Health. 2009;48:189–99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Latzer Y, Tzischinsky O, Geraisy N. Comparative study of eating-related attitudes and psychological traits between Israeli-Arab and-Jewish schoolgirls. J Adolesc. 2007;30(4):627–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Rieger E, Touyz SW, Swain T, Beumont PJ. Cross-cultural research on anorexia nervosa: assumptions regarding the role of body weight. Int J Eat Disord. 2001;29:205–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Skrzypek S, Wehmeier PM, Remschmidt H. Body image assessment using body size estimation in recent studies on anorexia nervosa. a brief review. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;10:215–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldzak-Kunik G, Friedman R, Spitz M, Sandler L, Leshem M. Intact sensory function in anorexia nervosa. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95:272–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cortese S, Falissard B, Pigaiani Y, et al. The relationship between body mass index and body size dissatisfaction in young adolescents: spline function analysis. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:1098–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ahern AL, Bennett KM, Kelly M, Hetherington MM. A qualitative exploration of young women’s attitudes towards the thin ideal. J Health Psychol. 2011;16:70–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Collins EM. Body figure perceptions and preferences among preadolescent children. Int J Eat Disord. 1990;10:199–208.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Te’eni-Harari T, Eyal K. Liking them thin: adolescents’ favorite television characters and body image. J Health Commun. 2015;20:607–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lazter Y, Weinberger-Litman S, Gerson B, Rosch A, Mischel R, Hinden T, et al. Negative religious coping predicts disordered eating pathology among orthodox Jewish adolescent girls. J Relig Health. 2015;53:1760–71.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement