Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Prevalence of unhealthy behaviors and their associations with non-suicidal self-injury, suicidal ideation and suicide attempt among Chinese adolescents

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health volume 18, Article number: 61 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Unhealthy lifestyle behaviors among adolescents have emerged as a significant public health concern worldwide, however, there is little investigation on the impact of unhealthy behaviors on non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide attempt (SA). This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of seven unhealthy behaviors as well as their associations with NSSI, SI and SA, and to explore whether the aforementioned associations differ across sex.

Methods

A total of 74,152 adolescents were included in this study via a multi-stage, stratified cluster, random sampling method in 2021. Information about unhealthy behaviors (insufficient physical activity, current smoking, current drinking, excessive screen time, long homework time, insufficient sleep and unhealthy BMI), NSSI, SI, SA and other demographics was collected. Sampling weights were used to estimate the prevalence, and the weighted logistic regression models were performed. Stratified analyses by sex and sensitive analyses were conducted.

Results

Overview, the weighted prevalence of adolescents had more than five unhealthy behaviors were 5.2%, with boys showing a higher prevalence than girls (6.5% vs.3.8%). Current smoking, current drinking, excessive screen use, long homework time, insufficient sleep, and unhealthy BMI were significantly associated with NSSI, SI and SA. Moreover, adolescents with high lifestyle risk scores were associated with an increased risk of NSSI (5–7 vs. 0: OR 6.38, 95% CI 5.24–7.77), SI (5–7 vs. 0: OR 7.67, 95% CI 6.35–9.25), and SA (5–7 vs. 0: OR 9.57, 95% CI 6.95–13.17). Significant sex differences were found in the associations of unhealthy behaviors with NSSI, SI and SA.

Conclusion

Unhealthy behaviors are quite common among Chinese adolescents. Adolescents with multiple unhealthy behaviors are associated with increased risks of NSSI, SI, and SA. The implementation of school and family-based interventions to promote healthy lifestyles is recommended as a preventive measure against self-injurious behavior and suicidality in adolescents.

Introduction

Suicide is the fourth leading cause of death among adolescents according to World Health Organization (WHO) [1], placing a tremendous burden on societies and families. Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide attempt (SA) are important predictors of future suicide and pose serious public health concerns for adolescents worldwide [2,3,4,5]. Previous evidence indicated that 26.1%, 17.5%, 4.4% of Chinese adolescents experienced NSSI, SI, and SA within the past 12 months, respectively [6], highlighting the urgent need to address self-injurious behavior and suicidality in adolescents. Therefore, it is vital to identify modifiable factors associated with NSSI, SI and SA to effectively prevent suicide in adolescents.

Recent studies have emphasized the links between unhealthy lifestyle behaviors and self-injurious behavior and suicidality [4, 7, 8]. Adopting a healthy lifestyle, which includes regular physical activity, avoiding smoking, limiting alcohol consumption, and ensuring sufficient sleep, plays a crucial role in promoting both physical and mental well-being [9]. Adolescence is a critical period of transitioning from childhood to adulthood, during which lifestyle habits are formed and developed [10]. Consequently, unhealthy lifestyle behaviors among adolescents have emerged as an important public health concern. Inadequate sleep, lack of physical activity, and excessive screen time are common lifestyle risk behaviors in adolescents recently [9, 11, 12]. It is recommended that adolescents aim for 8–10 h of sleep per night [13], however, a majority of Chinese adolescents sleep less than eight hours [14]. Although WHO recommends an average of 60 min/day of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity throughout the week for adolescents [15], a cross-sectional study conducted in China revealed that 65.9% of adolescents are physically inactive [16]. With the advancement of technology, screen usage, including watching TV, tablets, and smartphones, has also become an integral part of daily life. It is advised that adolescents limit their screen time to less than 2 h per day [17], however, most adolescents exceed this recommendation [18]. Additionally, smoking and drinking have been reported among Chinese adolescents [4, 19].

There is growing attention on the associations of unhealthy behaviors with NSSI, SI and SA among adolescents. Previous studies have demonstrated that unhealthy BMI status, smoking and drinking, may increase the vulnerability of adolescents to engage in suicidal behaviors [19, 20]. Moreover, excessive time spent on sedentary behaviors, such as screen time and homework time, has been associated with suicidal behavior in adolescents [21, 22]. Additionally, inadequate sleep and lack of physical activity have been widely reported to be associated with suicidal behavior in adolescents [14, 23].

However, most previous studies only consider the independent association of each unhealthy behavior with NSSI, SI and SA [7, 14, 19, 22], while ignoring the impact of co-occurrence of multiple unhealthy behaviors. Furthermore, previous evidence has suggested that there are sex differences in the distribution of unhealthy behaviors among adolescents, with boys spending more time on physical activity and screens compared to girls [16, 24, 25]. Additionally, adolescent boys and girls exhibit different characteristics in terms of suicidal behavior [4, 8, 20], therefore, there is a great need to explore the associations of unhealthy behaviors with NSSI, SI and SA in different sex, which is critical for sex-specific risk identification and intervention.

Herein, to gain a better understanding of the impact of unhealthy behaviors on suicidal behaviors, we conducted this study aimed to investigate the prevalence of seven unhealthy behaviors as well as their associations with NSSI, SI and SA, and to explore whether the aforementioned associations differ between adolescent boys and girls.

Method

Study design and participants

The study utilized the data from the 2021 School-based Chinese Adolescents Health Survey (SCAHS), which is a large-scale survey about the health-related behaviors and mental health problems among Chinses adolescents (grades 7–12) conducted from October 2021 to March 2022. A multi-stage, stratified cluster, random sampling method was used in the 2021 SCAHS to obtain a nationally representative sample of Chinese adolescents, and the procedures have been descried in previous studies [19, 26]. In stage 1, the provinces in mainland China were divided into three economic strata (high, medium, low) based on per capita gross domestic product (GDP) level, and three provinces were randomly selected from each stratum (only two provinces from medium level were selected; see Fig. S1 for the geographical distribution of the selected provinces). A total of eight provinces were selected. In stage 2, we divided the cities within each selected province into three economic strata (high, medium, low) according to per capita GDP level, and one city from each stratum was randomly chosen. In stage 3, six junior high schools, four senior high schools, and two vocational high schools were randomly chosen based on the proportion of the three types of schools in the selected cities. In stage 4, two classes were randomly selected from each grade within the chosen schools, and all students in the selected classes were invited to participated in the study voluntarily.

To protect the privacy of the students, information was collected via completing anonymous self-reported questionnaires by students in the classroom during a regular class period (i.e., 45 min), and the survey was administrated by the trained research assistants without the presence of teachers. Prior to the survey, the assistants informed all participants about the purpose of the study in detail, and the completeness and quality of the questionnaires were also checked by the assistants at the end of survey.

In total, 85,046 students aged 11–21 years were invited on the day of the survey, and 74,152 students’ questionnaires were completed and qualified for our study (a response rate of 87.2%).

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by Sun Yat-sen University School of Public Health Institutional Review Board. Written informed consents were obtained from each participant who was at least 18 years old or from one of the parents of each participant who was under 18 years old.

Measure

Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI)

NSSI was measured by the Chinese version of the Functional Assessment of Self-Mutilation, which has been widely used in Chinese adolescents [6, 27]. The scale consisted of eight different forms of NSSI (i.e., hitting, head banging, stabbing, pinching, scratching, biting, burning, and cutting), and respondents were asked to report the frequency they harmed themselves deliberately in the above forms without the thought of taking the life during the past 12 months. Students who reported the frequency of NSSI of three or more times were classified as having NSSI [6].

Suicidal ideation and suicidal attempt

SI was assessed by the question “During the past 12 months, how many times did you seriously consider attempting suicide?” SA was measured by the question “During the past 12 months, how many times did you actually attempt suicide?” For the above questions, students who reported one or more times were identified as having SI or SA.

Unhealthy behaviors

Unhealthy behaviors included insufficient physical activity, current smoking, current drinking, excessive screen time, long homework time, insufficient sleep and unhealthy body mass index (BMI).

Physical activity was measured by the question “During the past week, how many days did you exercise that increased your heart rate or breathing rate for at least 60 min?” The response ranged from 0 to 7, and adolescents who reported less than 5 days were identified as having insufficient physical activity [16].

Current smoking/drinking was assessed by asking the adolescents how many days they smoke/drank alcohol during the last 30 days, and those answered one or more days were classified as current smoking/drinking.

Time spent on screen was investigated by self-reported time spent on a typical weekday and weekend day performing a variety of screen-based activities for entertainment, including surfing the Internet (e.g., video watching), watching TV and playing electronic devices (e.g., smartphone, tablet). Average daily time was calculated using the following formula: (weekday time*5 + weekend time*2)/7 [18]. Adolescents who spent screen time more than 2 h per day were identified as having excessive screen time [18, 28].

Time spent on homework was also investigated by self-reported time spent on a typical weekday and weekend day doing homework, and the average daily time was calculated based on the above formula. Adolescents who spent homework time more than 3 h per day were classified as having long homework time [9].

Sleep duration was measured by asking adolescents how many hours they slept on weekdays and weekends during the last month, respectively. Daily sleep duration was calculated by the formula: (hours on weekdays*5 + hours on weekends*2)/7. Adolescents who reported sleep duration less than 8 h per day were identified as having insufficient sleep [14].

BMI was measured by self-report height and weight. Based on body mass index growth curves for Chinese children and adolescents [29], BMI was classified into four categories: normal, underweight (BMI < 5th), overweight (85th ≤ BMI < 95th), obesity (BMI ≥ 95th). BMI was also binned into a dichotomous variable indicating healthy (normal) or unhealthy (underweight, overweight and obesity) [30].

To evaluate the impact of multiple unhealthy behaviors on mental health, a lifestyle risk score was constructed. For the above seven behaviors, respondents were scored 1 if engaged in each of the unhealthy behaviors and 0 if they did not. Therefore, the lifestyle risk score was a sum of each score, with the score ranging from 0 to 7.

Other variables

Other variables included age, biological sex (male, female), residence (urban, rural), having brothers or sisters (yes, no), living arrangement (living with parents, living with a single parent, living with others), household socioeconomic status (HSS; good, average, poor), and parents’ education level (primary school or below, middle school, university or above).

Statistical analysis

Considering the intricate multistage sampling design, for all statistical analyses, data were weighted via appropriate sampling weights to adjust for unequal probabilities of selection. In the current study, the missing data of the potential covariates were imputed using multiple imputations by chained equations.

First, descriptive analyses stratified by NSSI, SI and SA, respectively, were conducted to describe the demographic characteristics. Data were presented as mean (standard deviation, SD) for continuous variables and frequencies (proportions) for categorical variables, and the differences among groups were tested using appropriate statistical approaches such as t-test or Chi-square test. Second, the weighted prevalence of each lifestyle risk behavior among Chinese adolescents was estimated, and differences in distribution between boys and girls were also compared. Third, weighted logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to explore the association of lifestyle risk behavior with NSSI, SI and SA. Two models were conducted to assess the impact of potential covariates based on previous literature. Model 1 was adjusted for age and sex. Model 2 was adjusted for age, sex, province, residence, having brothers/sisters, living arrangement, HSS, father’s education level, and mother’s education level.

Subgroup analyses were also conducted to examine whether the associations of lifestyle risk behavior with NSSI, SI and SA varied by sex, and any sex difference in the associations were also examined via calculating a ratio of ORs. In sensitivity analyses, we repeated all analyses using the complete dataset to test the robustness of the results.

All data analyses were carried out using R 4.1.0 (the R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), and the statistical tests were two-sided, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Result

Sample characteristic

Table 1 presents the sample characteristics stratified by NSSI, SI and SA. The study included 74,152 adolescents in the final analyses, with a mean (SD) age of 14.7 (1.8) years, and almost half were boys (weighted prevalence, 52.6%). The weighted prevalence of NSSI, SI and SA was 14.6%, 17.6% and 5.2%, respectively. Adolescents with NSSI, SI and SA were more likely to be girls, from urban residences, living with a single parent or others, have poor HSS than those without NSSI, SI and SA.

Table 1 Sample characteristic
Full size table

Prevalence of unhealthy behaviors among Chinese adolescents

Sex-specific distribution of unhealthy behaviors are presented in Fig. 1 and Table S1. The weighted prevalence of adolescents had zero or more than five unhealthy behaviors was 4.1 and 5.2%, respectively. The most common unhealthy behaviors among Chinese adolescents were insufficient physical activity (76.3%), followed by insufficient sleep (63.2%), excessive screen time (44.9%), unhealthy BMI (25.2%), long homework time (23.8%), current drinking (12.4%) and current smoking (4.7%). There were significant differences in the distribution of unhealthy behaviors between boys and girls, where boys were more likely to have excessive screen time, unhealthy BMI, current drinking and current smoking.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The weighted prevalence of unhealthy behaviors among Chinese adolescents

Full size image

Association of unhealthy behaviors with NSSI, SI and SA

As presented in Table 2, the weighted prevalence of NSSI, SI, and SA among Chinese adolescents with more than five unhealthy behaviors was 24.7%, 30.7% and 11.5%, respectively. After adjusting for covariates in Model 2, adolescents with high lifestyle risk scores were associated with an increased risk of NSSI (5–7 vs. 0: OR 6.38, 95% CI 5.24–7.77), SI (5–7 vs. 0: OR 7.67, 95% CI 6.35–9.25), and SA (5–7 vs. 0: OR 9.57, 95% CI 6.95–13.17). A trend on the association of the number of unhealthy behaviors with NSSI, SI and SA was also observed (P for trend < 0.001).

Table 2 The weighted associations of lifestyle risk score with NSSI, suicidal ideation and suicidal attempt among Chinese adolescents
Full size table

For each unhealthy behavior, after adjusting for covariates in Model 2, current smoking, current drinking, excessive screen time, long homework time, insufficient sleep, and unhealthy BMI were significantly associated with NSSI, SI and SA. In addition, insufficient physical activity was only associated with NSSI and SI (shown in Fig. 2 and Table S2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The weighted associations of specific unhealthy behavior with NSSI, suicidal ideation and suicidal attempt among Chinese adolescents. Model 2 adjusted for age, sex, province, residence, having brothers/sisters, living arrangement, HSS, and parents’ education level

Full size image

Subgroup analyses

The results stratified by sex were shown in Fig. 3. After adjusting for covariates, the significant associations of lifestyle risk scores with NSSI, SI and SA were also found among boys and girls. Adolescent girls who had more than 5 unhealthy behaviors was associated with higher odds of NSSI (OR 7.95, 95% CI 6.12–10.32) and SI (OR 9.75, 95% CI 7.57–12.55) than boys, and significant sex difference were found for the above associations (P for ROR < 0.05; Table S3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The weighted associations of lifestyle risk score with NSSI, suicidal ideation and suicidal attempt among boys and girls. All models were adjusted for age, sex, province, residence, having brothers/sisters, living arrangement, HSS, and parents’ education level (models for boys and girls were not adjusted for sex)

Full size image

Regarding each unhealthy behavior, girls who engaged in current smoking, current drinking was associated with a higher risk of NSSI, SI and SA compared to boys. In addition, the association between long homework time and NSSI was stronger among boys, while the association between excessive screen time and SI was stronger in girls (Table S4).

Sensitivity analyses

Sensitivity analyses using complete dataset (n = 64,716) to repeat the main analyses to examine the robustness of the results. The main analyses with complete dataset showed that the associations of lifestyle risk score with NSSI, SI and SA remained essentially unchanged (Table S5).

Discussion

A large-scale, school-based survey was conducted to investigate the prevalence of seven unhealthy behaviors and their associations with NSSI, SI and SA. The data revealed that 5.2% of Chinese adolescents had more than five unhealthy behaviors, and the prevalence among boys (6.5%) was higher than girls (3.8%). Unhealthy behaviors, including current smoking, current drinking, excessive screen time, long homework time, insufficient sleep and unhealthy BMI status, had a negative impact on self-injurious behavior and suicidality. Moreover, adolescents with high lifestyle risk scores were associated with an increased risk of NSSI, SI, and SA, and girls showed stronger association than boys.

Although only 5.2% of adolescents had more than five unhealthy behaviors, the majority of them experienced physical inactivity (76.3%), sleep deficiency (63.2%), and excessive screen time (44.9%). Similarly, the US Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) had shown that 77.9% of US adolescents slept less than 8 h per day and 76.8% of them did not get sufficient physical activity [7]. Another cross-sectional study conducted in Australia had found that most adolescents exceeded guidelines for screen time (84%), did not achieve sufficient moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (75%) and got inadequate sleep (56%) [31]. Discrepancies in the prevalence of these behaviors may be attributed to cultural backgrounds or different characteristics of the study populations, such as different sampling methods, measurements, and criteria. Consistent with previous evidence [12, 14, 19], the current study also found that adolescent boys and girls show different patterns in the distribution of unhealthy behaviors. Boys were more likely to smoke, drink, spend excessive time on screen-based activities, and have an unhealthy BMI status, while girls were more likely to be physically inactive, spend too much time on homework, and not get enough sleep. Despite the low rate of having more than five unhealthy behaviors, the negative impact of these behaviors emphasizes the need for schools and families to assist adolescents in developing healthy lifestyle habits to improve their well-being.

In line with previous evidence, this study suggested that excessive screen time was associated with NSSI and suicidality among adolescents. Jin and colleagues conducted a cross-sectional study involving 16,853 Chinese adolescents and found that those who spent more than 2 h per day on screen had an increased risk of SI and SA [8]. Similarly, a separate cross-sectional study conducted in Canada indicated that screen time ≤ 2 h/d had a protective effect against suicidality among adolescents [28]. Excessive screen time may lead adolescents to become immersed in a virtual world where rules may not apply, potentially increasing the likelihood of behavioral problems such as aggressive behaviors [32]. Notably, the study found that the association between screen time and SI was stronger in girls. This could be attributed to the fact that females tend to adopt avoidant and inactive coping styles, and previous research has reported a higher prevalence of emotional problems among female adolescents [33]. The accumulation of negative emotions after prolonged screen time may therefore make them more susceptible to engaging in suicidal behavior [27].

Our findings indicated that insufficient sleep duration was associated with NSSI, SI and SA, which was consistent with previous literature. Similarly, YRBS has demonstrated that US adolescents who sleep less than 8 h per day have a higher risk of SI and SA [34]. The possible explanation may be that sleep deprivation exerts a negative impact on adolescents’ attention, judgment and impulse control, which contributes to self-injurious behavior and suicidality due to impulsivity and loss of inhibition [35, 36]. Additionally, our study found an association between unhealthy BMI status and suicidal behaviors, which aligns with previous evidence. A meta-analysis including 104,907 adolescents in 45 low- and middle-income countries also suggested that overweight and obesity were significantly associated with SI and SA [37]. Kim et al. indicated that adolescents being underweight were significantly associated with increased odds of having a suicidal attempt [38]. Given the current popularity of fitness among adolescents, adolescents being obese may be perceived as lacking self-control, while those being underweight may be stigmatized as skinny [39, 40]. The negative attitudes towards obesity and the stigma faced by those identified as underweight can influence self-esteem during adolescence, resulting in poor mental health [19, 41]. Consequently, adolescents with an unhealthy BMI status may experience more social support frustration and self-stigma, leading to an elevated risk of suicidal behavior. However, we did not observe a significant sex difference in the associations of sleep and BMI with NSSI, SI and SA.

In addition, the study found that both current smoking and current drinking were positively associated with suicidal behaviors among adolescents. Several studies found similar associations corroborating [42, 43]. It is well established that smoking and excessive alcohol consumption can disturb the neuroendocrine system, which subsequently increases the risk of suicide-related behaviors [44, 45]. Previous evidence has also suggested that smoking, drinking, and self-injurious behavior share similar psychological processes, and substance use may contribute to the habituation of self-injurious behavior [46]. Interestingly, this study found that the associations of current smoking and drinking with NSSI, SI and SA were stronger in adolescent girls compared to boys, which supports prior evidence. Similarly, a cross-sectional study conducted in Korean adolescents also showed that current smoking had a greater impact on suicidal behaviors among female adolescents than males [43]. Likewise, Phillips et al. also found that the associations between alcohol use and suicidality were stronger in adolescent girls than boys [47].

Despite the extensive body of research on the associations of unhealthy behaviors with self-injurious behavior and suicidality, there are few studies focusing on the number of unhealthy behaviors on suicidal behaviors while considering a range of covariates. It is worth noting that the occurrence of multiple unhealthy behaviors has a more detrimental impact on suicidal behaviors compared to single behavior, as supported by previous studies. Engaging in a single unhealthy behavior may increase the likelihood of engaging in other unhealthy behaviors, and when these risky behaviors are combined, the possibility of mental health problems increases [48]. For instance, Hwang et al. suggested that adolescents with a higher lifestyle risk score were more prone to suicidal ideation [30], and a similar finding was also observed in Australian adolescents [49]. The probability of mental health problems increases with the number of unhealthy behaviors, providing strong evidence for population-level interventions for integrated unhealthy lifestyle behaviors. Additionally, we could observe significant sex differences in the foregoing associations, which was consistent with prior research [9]. This study revealed that a considerable number of adolescents engaged in multiple unhealthy behaviors simultaneously, and the results also suggested that the co-occurrence of multiple risk factors heightens the likelihood of adverse health outcomes [50, 51]. In sum, this study highlights the importance of not only considering the impact of specific unhealthy behavior on self-injurious behavior and suicidality among adolescents, but also recognizing the co-occurrence of multiple risk behaviors. The findings of this study contribute to the understanding of the necessity for school and family-based health promotion efforts and the development of strategies to prevent self-injurious and suicidal behaviors in adolescents by promoting healthy lifestyles, ultimately improving their quality of life.

The main strength of our study is that our study uses a multi-stage, stratified cluster, random sampling method to obtain a nationally representative sample of Chinese adolescents, which provides sufficient statistical power and broad representativeness to investigate the prevalence of multiple unhealthy behaviors and their associations with NSSI, SI and SA. However, several limitations are worth noting. First, the information about unhealthy behaviors, self-injurious behavior and suicidality was collected via self-report, which can not preclude recall bias. Meanwhile, despite the survey was anonymous, adolescents may provide answers influenced by social desirability because of the sensitivity to such questions (such as current smoking and suicidal behaviors). However, previous evidence has demonstrated that self-reporting is a common and widely accepted method [52]. Second, this study did not include diet-related behaviors (e.g., breakfast and beverage consumption), which is also an important part of lifestyle behavior. Future studies need to consider the impact of these behaviors. Third, the study sample was primarily derived from school students and did not include adolescents absent from school, nevertheless, suicidal behaviors may be more common among those absent students. Fourth, the causality of the assessed factors is difficult to determine since the nature of current research is a cross-sectional study design. Given that the measurement of outcome (NSSI, SI, SA) was limited to last 12 months while the measurement of partial exposure (e.g. current smoking/drinking) was limited to the past month, the possibility of potential reverse causation also exists. Fifth, the study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, so the results might be biased due to the influence of COVID-19. Therefore, there is a need for future studies to remove the effect of COVID-19 and verify our findings.

Conclusion

The results of this study demonstrate that multiple unhealthy behaviors are quite common among adolescents. Furthermore, this study expands upon existing evidence by highlighting the association of high lifestyle risk scores with NSSI, SI, and SA in adolescents. These findings have important implications for the development of early interventions aimed at enhancing the well-being of adolescents. Considering the modifiable nature of unhealthy behaviors, it is crucial for adolescents to recognize the potential benefits of adopting healthy lifestyles. Therefore, we recommend implementing school and family-based interventions that promote healthy lifestyles as a preventive measure against self-injurious behavior and suicidality in adolescents.

Availability of data and materials

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

NSSI:

Non-suicidal self-injury

SI:

Suicidal ideation

SA:

Suicidal attempt

SCAHS:

School-based Chinese Adolescents Health Survey

BMI:

Body mass index

HSS:

Household socioeconomic status

SD:

Standard deviation

OR:

Odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

References

  1. WHO. Suicide worldwide in 2019: global health estimates. In.; 2021.

  2. Gillies D, Christou MA, Dixon AC, Featherston OJ, Rapti I, Garcia-Anguita A, Villasis-Keever M, Reebye P, Christou E, Al Kabir N, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of self-harm in adolescents: meta-analyses of community-based studies 1990–2015. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018;57(10):733–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lim KS, Wong CH, McIntyre RS, Wang J, Zhang Z, Tran BX, Tan W, Ho CS, Ho RC. Global lifetime and 12-month prevalence of suicidal behavior deliberate self-harm and non-suicidal self-injury in children and adolescents between 1989 and 2018: a meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(22):4581.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu XC, Chen H, Liu ZZ, Wang JY, Jia CX. Prevalence of suicidal behaviour and associated factors in a large sample of Chinese adolescents. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019;28(3):280–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Geoffroy MC, Bouchard S, Per M, Khoury B, Chartrand E, Renaud J, Turecki G, Colman I, Orri M. Prevalence of suicidal ideation and self-harm behaviours in children aged 12 years and younger: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(9):703–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wan Y, Chen R, Ma S, McFeeters D, Sun Y, Hao J, Tao F. Associations of adverse childhood experiences and social support with self-injurious behaviour and suicidality in adolescents. Br J Psychiatry: J Mental Sci. 2019;214(3):146–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li X, Chi G, Taylor A, Chen ST, Memon AR, Zhang Y, Song Y, Li J, Luo X, Zou L. Lifestyle behaviors and suicide-related behaviors in adolescents: cross-sectional study using the 2019 YRBS data. Front Public Health. 2021;9:766972.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jin Z, Li R, Xu H, Rong F, Xiao W, Yu W, Sun Y, Zhang S, Tao F, Wan Y. Interaction effects of screen time and fast-food consumption on suicidal behaviours: evidence from a nationwide survey among Chinese adolescents. J Affect Disord. 2022;319:164–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cao R, Gao T, Ren H, Hu Y, Qin Z, Liang L, Li C, Mei S. Unique and cumulative effects of lifestyle-related behaviors on depressive symptoms among Chinese adolescents. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2022;68(2):354–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Janssen X, Mann KD, Basterfield L, Parkinson KN, Pearce MS, Reilly JK, Adamson AJ, Reilly JJ. Development of sedentary behavior across childhood and adolescence: longitudinal analysis of the Gateshead Millennium Study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;13:88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sampasa-Kanyinga H, Colman I, Goldfield GS, Janssen I, Wang J, Podinic I, Tremblay MS, Saunders TJ, Sampson M, Chaput JP. Combinations of physical activity, sedentary time, and sleep duration and their associations with depressive symptoms and other mental health problems in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Shen H, Yan J, Hong JT, Clark C, Yang XN, Liu Y, Chen ST. Prevalence of physical activity and sedentary behavior among Chinese children and adolescents: variations, gaps, and recommendations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9):3311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Paruthi S, Brooks LJ, D’Ambrosio C, Hall WA, Kotagal S, Lloyd RM, Malow BA, Maski K, Nichols C, Quan SF, et al. Recommended amount of sleep for pediatric populations: a consensus statement of the american academy of sleep medicine. J Clin Sleep Med. 2016;12(6):785–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Tang Y, Wan Y, Xu S, Zhang S, Hao J, Tao F. Nonlinear relationship between sleep duration and non-suicidal self-injurious behaviour among Chinese adolescents. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21(1):521.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, Carty C, Chaput JP, Chastin S, Chou R, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(24):1451–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu Z, Tang Y, Zhuang J, Liu Y, Wu X, Cai Y, Wang L, Cao ZB, Chen P. Physical activity, screen viewing time, and overweight/obesity among Chinese children and adolescents: an update from the 2017 physical activity and fitness in China-the youth study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):197.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ross R, Chaput JP, Giangregorio LM, Janssen I, Saunders TJ, Kho ME, Poitras VJ, Tomasone JR, El-Kotob R, McLaughlin EC, et al. Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines for adults aged 18–64 years and adults aged 65 years or older: an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020;45:S57-s102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang W, Du X, Guo Y, Li W, Zhang S, Zhang W, McIntyre RS, Tamura JK, Guo L, Lu C. Associations among screen time, sleep duration and depressive symptoms among Chinese adolescents. J Affect Disord. 2021;284:69–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Guo L, Xu Y, Huang G, Gao X, Deng X, Luo M, Xi C, Zhang WH, Lu C. Association between body weight status and suicidal ideation among Chinese adolescents: the moderating role of the child’s sex. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019;54(7):823–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang YY, Lei YT, Song Y, Lu RR, Duan JL, Prochaska JJ. Gender differences in suicidal ideation and health-risk behaviors among high school students in Beijing, China. J Global Health. 2019;9(1):010604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vancampfort D, Stubbs B, Mugisha J, Firth J, Van Damme T, Smith L, Koyanagi A. Leisure-time sedentary behavior and suicide attempt among 126,392 adolescents in 43 countries. J Affect Disord. 2019;250:346–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chau K, Bhattacherjee A, Senapati A, Guillemin F, Chau N. Association between screen time and cumulating school, behavior, and mental health difficulties in early adolescents: a population-based study. Psychiatry Res. 2022;310:114467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Uddin R, Burton NW, Maple M, Khan SR, Tremblay MS, Khan A. Low physical activity and high sedentary behaviour are associated with adolescents’ suicidal vulnerability: evidence from 52 low- and middle-income countries. Acta Paediatr. 2020;109(6):1252–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Millarini V, Caini S, Allamani A, Ermini I, Querci A, Masala G, Fabbri S. Prevalence and co-occurrence of unhealthy lifestyle habits and behaviours among secondary school students in Tuscany, central Italy. Public Health. 2019;166:89–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sanz-Martín D, Ubago-Jiménez JL, Ruiz-Tendero G, Zurita-Ortega F, Melguizo-Ibáñez E, Puertas-Molero P. The relationships between physical activity, screen time and sleep time according to the adolescents’ sex and the day of the week. Healthc (Basel Switzerland). 2022;10(10):1955.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lai W, Li W, Guo L, Wang W, Xu K, Dou Q, Shi J, Teopiz KM, McIntyre RS, Lu C. Association between bullying victimization, coping style, and mental health problems among Chinese adolescents. J Affect Disord. 2023;324:379–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tang J, Ma Y, Lewis SP, Chen R, Clifford A, Ammerman BA, Gazimbi MM, Byrne A, Wu Y, Lu X, et al. Association of internet addiction with nonsuicidal self-injury among adolescents in China. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(6):e206863.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sampasa-Kanyinga H, Chaput JP, Goldfield GS, Janssen I, Wang J, Hamilton HA, Colman I. 24-hour movement guidelines and suicidality among adolescents. J Affect Disord. 2020;274:372–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Li H, Ji CY, Zong XN, Zhang YQ. Body mass index growth curves for Chinese children and adolescents aged 0 to 18 years. Chin J Pediatr. 2009;47(7):493–8.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hwang S, Nam JY. Do lifestyle risk behaviors affect anxiety, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation among adolescents? Psychiatry Res. 2022;318:114942.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gardner LA, Champion KE, Chapman C, Newton NC, Slade T, Smout S, Teesson M, Sunderland M. Multiple lifestyle risk behaviours and hierarchical dimensions of psychopathology in 6640 Australian adolescents. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023;57(2):241–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Eirich R, McArthur BA, Anhorn C, McGuinness C, Christakis DA, Madigan S. Association of screen time with internalizing and externalizing behavior problems in children 12 years or younger: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2022;79(5):393–405.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yoon Y, Eisenstadt M, Lereya ST, Deighton J. Gender difference in the change of adolescents’ mental health and subjective wellbeing trajectories. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023;32(9):1569–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Joseph VA, Kreski NT, Keyes KM. Sleep deprivation and suicide risk among minoritized US adolescents. BMC Psychiatry. 2023;23(1):638.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. O’Brien LM. The neurocognitive effects of sleep disruption in children and adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2009;18(4):813–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Perlis ML, Grandner MA, Chakravorty S, Bernert RA, Brown GK, Thase ME. Suicide and sleep: is it a bad thing to be awake when reason sleeps? Sleep Med Rev. 2016;29:101–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang MZ, Tang R, Rao WM, Wang MH, Liu MW, Yu HJ, He QQ. Body mass index and the risk of suicidal ideation and suicide attempt among youth in 45 low-and middle-income countries. J Affect Disord. 2022;298(Pt A):357–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim B, Kim HS, Park S, Kwon JA. BMI and perceived weight on suicide attempts in Korean adolescents: findings from the Korea youth risk behavior survey (KYRBS) 2020 to 2021. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):1107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. DePierre JA, Puhl RM. Experiences of weight stigmatization: a review of self-report assessment measures. Obes Facts. 2012;5(6):897–918.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Anderson J, Bresnahan M. Communicating stigma about body size. Health Commun. 2013;28(6):603–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Whetstone LM, Morrissey SL, Cummings DM. Children at risk: the association between perceived weight status and suicidal thoughts and attempts in middle school youth*. J Sch Health. 2007;77(2):59–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Banzer R, Haring C, Buchheim A, Oehler S, Carli V, Wasserman C, Kaess M, Apter A, Balazs J, Bobes J, et al. Factors associated with different smoking status in European adolescents: results of the SEYLE study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;26(11):1319–29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Han MA, Kim KS, Ryu SY, Kang MG, Park J. Associations between smoking and alcohol drinking and suicidal behavior in Korean adolescents: Korea Youth behavioral risk factor surveillance, 2006. Prev Med. 2009;49(2–3):248–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pompili M, Serafini G, Innamorati M, Dominici G, Ferracuti S, Kotzalidis GD, Serra G, Girardi P, Janiri L, Tatarelli R, et al. Suicidal behavior and alcohol abuse. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7(4):1392–431.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Vulser H, Wiernik E, Tartour E, Thomas F, Pannier B, Czernichow S, Hanon O, Simon T, Simon JM, Ducolombier C, et al. Smoking and the association between depressive symptoms and absolute neutrophil count in the investigations Préventives et cliniques cohort study. Psychosom Med. 2015;77(9):1039–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Klonsky ED, Muehlenkamp JJ. Self-injury: a research review for the practitioner. J Clin Psychol. 2007;63(11):1045–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Phillips GL, Turner BC, Felt D, Marro RL, Wang X, Ruprecht MM, Broschart J, Beach LB. Alcohol use and suicidality by sexual orientation among U.S. Youth, 2009–2017. Am J Prev Med. 2020;59(3):394–403.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Rao S, Shah N, Jawed N, Inam S, Shafique K. Nutritional and lifestyle risk behaviors and their association with mental health and violence among Pakistani adolescents: results from the National Survey of 4583 individuals. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:431.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Mewton L, Champion K, Kay-Lambkin F, Sunderland M, Thornton L, Teesson M. Lifestyle risk indices in adolescence and their relationships to adolescent disease burden: findings from an Australian national survey. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Sameroff AJ. Developmental systems and psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol. 2000;12(3):297–312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Appleyard K, Egeland B, van Dulmen MH, Sroufe LA. When more is not better: the role of cumulative risk in child behavior outcomes. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip. 2005;46(3):235–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Campbell C, Tanzer M, Saunders R, Booker T, Allison E, Li E, O’Dowda C, Luyten P, Fonagy P. Development and validation of a self-report measure of epistemic trust. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(4):e0250264.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors expressed the gratitude to all the participants in our study and acknowledge the contribution of the local health professionals, the Department of Education, and the participating schools.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81761128030).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Guoliang Huang and Ciyong Lu have contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen university, 74 Zhongshan Rd 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China

    Wenjian Lai, Herui Wu, Liwen Yang, Ruiying Chen, Zhiyao Xin, Xiaojuan Zhang, Wanxin Wang, Lan Guo & Ciyong Lu

  2. Center for Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring of Guangdong, 753 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China

    Guoliang Huang

Authors
  1. Wenjian Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Herui Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liwen Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ruiying Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhiyao Xin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiaojuan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Wanxin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lan Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Guoliang Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ciyong Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

W.L. participated in the study design and coordination, performed the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript; H.W. and L.Y. participated in the interpretation of the data, and reviewed the article; R.C., Z.X., and X.Z. participated in the investigation and data collection; W.W. and L.G. reviewed and revised the manuscript; G.H. and C.L. conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and helped to draft the manuscript. G.H. and C.L. had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. All authors were in agreement with the final submitted manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guoliang Huang or Ciyong Lu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by Sun Yat-sen University School of Public Health Institutional Review Board. Written informed consents were obtained from each participant who was at least 18 years old or from one of the parents of each participant who was under 18 years old.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Prevalence of unhealthy behaviors among Chinese adolescents. Table S2. The weighted associations of different unhealthy behaviors with NSSI, suicidal ideation and suicidal attempt among Chinese adolescents.Table S3. The weighted associations of lifestyle risk score with NSSI, suicidal ideation and suicidal attempt among boys and girls.Table S4. The weighted associations of different unhealthy behaviors with NSSI, suicidal ideation and suicidal attempt among boys and girls.Table S5.. The Weighted associations of lifestyle risk score with NSSI, suicidal ideation and suicidal attempt among Chinese adolescents: using the complete dataset (n = 64176).Figure S1. The geographical distribution of the selected provinces.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lai, W., Wu, H., Yang, L. et al. Prevalence of unhealthy behaviors and their associations with non-suicidal self-injury, suicidal ideation and suicide attempt among Chinese adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 18, 61 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-024-00742-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-024-00742-y

Keywords

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health

ISSN: 1753-2000