Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Individual brain regulation as learned via neurofeedback is related to affective changes in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health volume 17, Article number: 6 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Emotions often play a role in neurofeedback (NF) regulation strategies. However, investigations of the relationship between the induced neuronal changes and improvements in affective domains are scarce in electroencephalography-based studies. Thus, we extended the findings of the first study on slow cortical potential (SCP) NF in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) by linking affective changes to whole-brain activity during rest and regulation.

Methods

Forty-one male adolescents with ASD were scanned twice at rest using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Between scans, half underwent NF training, whereas the other half received treatment as usual. Furthermore, parents reported on their child’s affective characteristics at each measurement. The NF group had to alternatingly produce negative and positive SCP shifts during training and was additionally scanned using functional magnetic resonance imaging while applying their developed regulation strategies.

Results

No significant treatment group-by-time interactions in affective or resting-state measures were found. However, we found increases of resting activity in the anterior cingulate cortex and right inferior temporal gyrus as well as improvements in affective characteristics over both groups. Activation corresponding to SCP differentiation in these regions correlated with the affective improvements. A further correlation was found for Rolandic operculum activation corresponding to positive SCP shifts. There were no significant correlations with the respective achieved SCP regulation during NF training.

Conclusion

SCP NF in ASD did not lead to superior improvements in neuronal or affective functioning compared to treatment as usual. However, the affective changes might be related to the individual strategies and their corresponding activation patterns as indicated by significant correlations on the whole-brain level.

Trial registration This clinical trial was registered at drks.de (DRKS00012339) on 20th April, 2017.

Background

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) constitutes a pervasive neurodevelopmental disorder which onsets during childhood and comprises deficits in communication and interaction abilities as well as atypical, repetitive behavior [1]. A variety of therapeutic approaches exists, each focusing on different symptoms [2, 3].

A particular family of treatment approaches based on a system- and network-level understanding of ASD includes the application of non-invasive neuromodulation techniques [4]. Among these, transcranial direct current [5,6,7] and magnetic stimulation [8,9,10] have been more widely explored in the past. In contrast, neurofeedback (NF) is a neuromodulatory intervention without external stimulation.

Patients undergoing NF, train their voluntary control over certain characteristics of their brain activity. While reviews on the application of electroencephalography-based (EEG) NF for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have yielded mixed results [11, 12], there is a specific recommendation for slow cortical potentials (SCPs) NF [13].

SCP NF has been successfully applied for the treatment of ADHD in children [14,15,16], adolescents [17] and adults [18]. These very slow EEG fluctuations (typically below 1 Hz) are related to the excitability threshold of the upper cortical layers, where SCP negativity corresponds to increased cortical excitability and SCP positivity to decreased cortical excitability [19]. However, the utility of NF for the treatment of ASD in general has been questioned [24].

This criticism is based on the high comorbidity of ASD with ADHD with estimates ranging from 37 to 85% [25] rendering it difficult to assign symptom improvements to either of the disorders separately. However, previous research using EEG NF in ADHD and ASD often focused on attention deficits [11, 26] while studies on the emotional and empathic components are largely missing. The recently conducted first study on SCP NF in ASD reported positive effects on ASD-specific symptomatology [27], but also showed the complex influence of the ADHD-related problems regarding attention, hyperactivity and impulsivity [28]. Overall, transdiagnostic similarities between ASD and ADHD encompass deficits in emotion regulation, emotion recognition, attention, cognitive flexibility, inhibition, reward processing, working memory, organization and planning [29, 30]. Different severity patterns of emotion recognition and regulation impairments between children and adolescents with and without ASD and/or ADHD have also been found [31,32,33]. In regards to empathic capabilities, individuals with ASD showed deficits in cognitive empathy, but not in affective empathy [35, 36]. Despite emotion regulation research in ASD still being in its infancy, the importance and efficacy of therapeutic approaches incorporating emotion regulation training for ASD are already evident [38, 39].

On a neuronal level, investigations via resting-state (RS) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) revealed lower average absolute global connectivity in children and adolescents with ASD compared to typically developing controls [42]. A meta-analysis on differences in resting activity between individuals with and without ASD quantified via regional homogeneity (ReHo; a measure sensitive to brain activity and local connectivity), amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF; activity within a certain frequency band) and cerebral blood flow, reported robust over-activation in language-related and motor areas as well as under-activation in the default mode network [43]. A large-scale, multi-center study reported a cluster reaching from the left posterior insula to the operculum showing decreases in voxel-matched homotopic connectivity (i.e., symmetric connectivity), ReHo and degree centrality (a measure of global connectedness) [44]. A second cluster was located in the right dorsal superior frontal cortex and showed increases in fractional ALFF (fALFF; an amplitude-normalized version of ALFF), ReHo and degree centrality [44].

Even though SCPs are a common NF target and further constitute suspected contributors to the blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) signal [20, 21], only few studies investigated the neural processes accompanying SCP self-regulation using fMRI. Hinterberger, Veit [45] showed that during transfer runs (training runs without feedback for decoupling regulation success from the feedback procedure) SCP negativity is related to wide-spread activation in fMRI. In turn, SCP positivity was associated with widespread deactivation.

We investigated potential treatment-induced changes in several affective characteristics on a subjective level via parental questionnaires to gain further knowledge on emotion regulation in ASD. Neuronal outcome measures at rest were assessed using three models previously related to alterations in brain connectivity and activity of individuals with ASD [42,43,44]. First, the percent amplitude of fluctuation (PerAF) model was used for assessing resting brain activity [47], constituting a less artifact-prone and easier to interpret derivative of (f)ALFF [43, 44]. Second, average brain-wide connectivity was assessed via global functional connectivity (GFC; [48]), a continuous and thus more sensitive alternative to degree centrality [44]. Third, ReHo [49, 50] was assessed as measure of local activity and connectivity [43, 44], placing itself conceptually between PerAF and GFC. Finally, we conducted a brain regulation task in the MRI scanner, based on suggested links between SCPs and the BOLD signal [21, 45], in which the participants had to apply the regulation strategies learned, and investigated potential relationships between whole-brain activation corresponding to SCP regulation and affective changes.

Methods

Experimental design

Participants were randomly allocated to either 24 sessions of SCP NF or treatment as usual (TAU). SCP feedback was calculated from the fronto-central electrode located according to the extended 10–20 EEG system and presented on a screen as graphical object of the participants’ choice. The participants’ goal was to gain volitional control over their brain activity. This was visualized by moving the object up or down via changes in SCP positivity or negativity. For details on the NF training protocol, EEG artifact correction, feedback presentation, etc. see Konicar, Radev [27]. In order to assess neuronal and subjective changes, fMRI and psychometric data were acquired before the first and after the last treatment session in both groups.

Participants

Potential male adolescent (12–17 years) participants with a diagnosis of ASD (according to the German version of the Autism Diagnostic Interview—Revised (ADI-R) [51] and/or the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, version 2 (ADOS-2) [52] were recruited and invited to a screening. The subsequent inclusion criteria were right-handedness and an IQ above 70 (if no previous IQ was available, an age-adequate test was administered as part of the screening process) [53, 54]. The recruitment was restricted to male adolescents due to the prevalence of ASD in this population. Participants were excluded in case of relevant psychiatric, neurological or internal conditions (head injuries, major axis I diagnosis of psychosis, obsessive–compulsive disorder, severe motor or vocal tics, Tourette syndrome, severe depression with suicidality) or MRI contraindications. Previous NF experience and current participation in pharmacological studies were not allowed. Concomitant psychosocial and pharmacological treatments were permitted if kept constant throughout study participation.

Psychometric assessment

We used the Emotion Regulation Checklist (ERC [55]) and the Griffith Empathy Measure (GEM [56]) to gather parental reports of the participants’ development regarding their affective and empathic abilities. The Emotion Regulation (ER) and Lability/Negativity (LN) subscales of the ERC were analyzed separately, with the former quantifying expression and self-awareness of emotions as well as empathy, and the latter mood lability and anger dysregulation. We concentrated on the Cognitive Empathy (CE) subscale of the GEM, since this ability was shown to be diminished in adolescents with ASD in contrast to affective empathy [35].

Since the frequent co-occurrence of ADHD constitutes the major point of discussion in the application of NF to patients with ASD, the “Diagnostic System for Psychiatric Disease in Children and Adolescent, parent-rated version 2” for ADHD (DISYPS-II [57]) was used to quantify the respective characteristics (henceforth “ADHD score”). The ADHD score was calculated, age-corrected and transformed to the “standard nine” (stanine) score.

FMRI acquisitions

We positioned the participants in the MRI scanner and fixated their heads using foam cushions. Eight minutes of RS data was acquired as the first functional scan to avoid potential task-related carryover effects. The participants were instructed to lie with their eyes open, look at a crosshair, let their mind wander and not to think of anything in particular.

In the SCP neurofeedback group only, after completing the training, a short brain regulation task was recorded in 2 min 42 s. This was done in order to investigate activation corresponding to the application of the SCP regulation strategies on a whole-brain level. The visual cues matched the SCP transfer run. Participants were instructed to apply their regulation strategies: A triangle pointing upwards (“Up” condition) indicated application of the strategy developed to induce negative SCP shifts and a triangle pointing downwards (“Down” condition) indicated application of the strategy developed to produce positive SCP shifts. The conditions were presented 5 times each for 8 s in a pseudo-randomized order interleaved with baselines of the same duration. Since the baseline in the SCP transfer run was only 2 s long and had no visual indicator, we added a crosshair of the same size and color scheme as the triangles for the fMRI run. There was no indication of the currently achieved regulation and, contrary to the SCP transfer run, no reward was given after regulation trials.

Measurements were performed on a Siemens Magnetom Prisma 3 T machine (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with the same sequence as in Moessnang, Schäfer [58] due to the previous successful application in a comparable population: echo/repetition time = 30/2000 ms, 3 mm isotropic resolution (+ 25% gap), 33 slices with 64 × 64 voxels (field of view = 192 × 192 × 123 mm), bandwidth = 2365 Hz/Px. Prospective acquisition correction (PACE) was used for online motion correction.

FMRI preprocessing

Unless mentioned otherwise, preprocessing was conducted using Statistical Parametric Mapping, version 12 (SPM12). In a combined first step, physiological artifacts were reduced using PESTICA [59] and slice-wise motion correction was performed with SLOMOCO [60]. This advanced motion correction approach was chosen as adolescents show markedly more in-scanner motion than adults. Slice-timing was corrected to the temporally middle slice. Each paradigm’s acquisitions were realigned together for each participant. A population-specific normalization template was created using the CerebroMatic toolbox [61] with spatially adaptive non-local means and hidden Markov random field filtering for increased homogeneity over the whole age range. Affine regularization was performed to the standard ICBM template for European brains with parameters downscaled by a factor 10 for better local fitting, as some brains showed unreasonable inflation without regularization. Thus, tissue distributions were age-adjusted but the localization of the regions were approximately in standard space. The original voxel size was used for reslicing [62]. The BrainWavelet toolbox [63] was employed for non-linear artifact correction providing additional mitigation of motion and other types of artifacts. The “threshold” parameter was set to “15” due to the application to unsmoothed data and “chsearch” to “harsh” to be more sensitive towards slow artifacts. The data was finally smoothed with a Gaussian kernel with full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 3 times the voxel size.

FMRI modelling

An adapted CompCor approach [64, 65] and the Fristion-24 model [66] were utilized for reduction of any residual physiological or movement-related artifacts in the brain regulation task and RS data. The latter was further band-limited to 0.01–0.10 Hz using frequency regressors [67]. Based on the filtered RS time series, three voxelwise models were set up: PerAF to quantify brain activity, GFC for brain-wide connectivity and ReHo for local activity and connectivity. Since the calculation of ReHo leads to spatial smoothing, this model was applied to the unsmoothed and filtered data. Afterwards, the ReHo maps were smoothed with a FWHM of 2 times the voxel size achieving smoothness similar to PerAF and GFC. Finally, ReHo and GFC were Fisher z-transformed before group analysis.

The brain regulation task was modeled using the 1st-level module in SPM12. The conditions (“Up”/“Down”) were used as regressors. The CompCor and Friston-24 time series were set as nuisance signals. In addition, the equivalent of SCP differentiation between changes in negativity and positivity was calculated as the difference between the “Up” and “Down” conditions (henceforth “fMRI differentiation”). The autocorrelation model was set to “FAST” [68].

Statistical inference

Questionnaire data was analyzed using linear mixed effects models (LMEs). Interactions between “treatment group”, “time” (factors) and “ADHD baseline score” (covariate) were analyzed and dropped if non-significant. The LMEs also included participants as random intercepts.

Whole-brain inference was conducted using the 2nd-level module in SPM12. “Treatment group”-by- “time” and “time” effects were analyzed in one model per RS measure. Contrasts for within-group effects were further estimated in case of non-significant interactions. Correlations of regulation direction-specific activation and fMRI differentiation with the ERC and GEM score changes were of interest for the brain regulation task. Family-wise error-corrected results are reported at the cluster- (primary threshold p ≤ 0.001) or peak-level. Influences of ADHD were controlled for with the pre-training ADHD scores as covariate.

Associations between the RS findings and questionnaire score changes over time were investigated on an exploratory basis using partial correlation (Pearson or Spearman, depending on a visual check of the distributions, corrected for treatment group; median cluster values were extracted using the MarsBaR toolbox 0.44).

In case of significant correlations between activation in the brain regulation task and questionnaire score changes, the latter were subsequently correlated with the average amount of SCP regulation corresponding to the activation contrast achieved during the third and last quarter (six days each) of NF training. These periods showed the strongest regulation or were closest to the second MRI session [27]. This way, we checked whether NF training success was related to score changes (c.f., Heinrich, Gevensleben [69]).

All tests (including neuroimaging models [70]) were two-sided and multiplicity-corrected to p ≤ 0.05. To correct for the number of questionnaire scales/RS models/brain regulation task correlations, we employed an in-house developed algorithm based on the dependency-adjusted D/AP approach [71] (see supplement for implementation).

Results

Participants

Out of 94 adolescents who were interested in participating in the study, 53 could not be enrolled (21 due to personal reasons, eleven due to neurological reasons or sub-threshold IQ, nine due to MRI contraindications, six were out of the target age range, six were left-handed). This resulted in a sample of 41 adolescents with an ASD diagnosis of which 21 were randomized into the SCP NF and 20 into the TAU group. Complete RS data and brain regulation task data was available for 36 and 20 participants respectively (three participants did not participate in the second session for personal reasons, two had to be excluded due to compromised data quality and one due to missing compliance). Baseline data of our sample is provided in Table 1, longitudinal data and comparisons are provided in Table 2.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics
Full size table
Table 2 Changes in emotion regulation, empathy and in-scanner movement
Full size table

The results of the SCP regulation training, ASD core symptoms longitudinally quantified via the Social Responsiveness Scale [72] and further information on the exact training protocol are provided in Konicar, Radev [27]. A detailed analysis of the comorbid ADHD symptoms and their influence on attention and expectancy measured via the contingent negative variation (CNV) in the EEG signal is presented in Prillinger, Radev [28].

Psychometric and behavioral analysis

No significant interaction effects were found for any psychometric scale. The ER subscale (higher is better) of the ERC showed a significant improvement of symptoms over both groups, whereas the LN (lower is better) and GEM CE (higher is better) subscales barely fell short of statistical significance. The LN subscale positively correlated with the pre-training ADHD score.

Since the PerAF results indicated a potential relationship with in-scanner movement, the mean of the total displacement output of the SLOMOCO step of RS preprocessing was additionally analyzed via LME to uncover potential further relationships with psychopathology. There was a significant time by group interaction where the SCP NF group showed significantly higher pre-training movement. Total displacement did not correlate with the ADHD score over both scans (Spearman ρ = − 0.05, p = 0.6790). No multiplicity correction was applied in the total displacement analysis.

Resting-state models

Over both groups, an increase in RS activity was found in the ventral anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Within the TAU group, a further increase was detected in the right precentral gyrus. Another cluster of increased resting activity over both groups stretching into the medial and inferior temporal gyrus (ITG) did not survive correction for the number of models. Upon visual inspection (see Fig. 1), the result in the precentral gyrus might be particularly biased by baseline differences. LMEs of the median values extracted from the clusters were run (treatment group, time and their interaction as factors, the ADHD score as covariate, random intercept per participant). These confirmed the time effect for the ACC (p = 0.0006) and temporal gyrus (p = 5.4E-6) and indicated a baseline difference (p = 0.0326), time (p = 3.5E-5) and interaction effects (p = 0.0020; all uncorrected) for the precentral gyrus. The ADHD score had no significant influence in either model. Details are presented in the upper section of Table 3 and left column of Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Results of the resting brain activity and brain regulation task analyses. The increase in the percent amplitude of fluctuations (PerAF) of the anterior cingulate cortex over both, the slow cortical potentials (SCP) neurofeedback and treatment as usual (TAU) group, is visualized in the top-left diagram. The middle-left diagram shows a PerAF increase in the precentral gyrus of the TAU and generally higher values in the SCP group. The bottom-left plot shows the PerAF changes over both groups in the temporal gyrus with stronger increases in the TAU group. The right scatter plots show the correlation of the brain regulation task (Pearson’s r corresponding to the parametric analysis as implemented in Statistical Parametric Mapping and Spearman’s due to potential outliers): The difference between the “Up” and “Down” conditions (i.e., fMRI differentiation) was anticorrelated with changes on the Lability/Negativity (ERC ΔLN) subscale of the Emotion Regulation Checklist. The SCP positivity condition correlated with changes on the Emotion Regulation (ERC ΔER) subscale. Changes on the Griffith Empathy Measure Cognitive Empathy (GEM ΔCE) subscale again significantly correlated with fMRI differentiation. The whole-brain 3D models were created using BrainNet Viewer 1.7 [73]

Full size image
Table 3 Results of the whole-brain resting-state analysis and brain regulation task
Full size table

Since precentral gyrus activation might be indicative of movement, the PerAF values of each region were Pearson partially correlated (corrected for measurement, treatment group and their interaction) with the mean total displacement (thresholded at 1.5 times the interquartile range due to potential outliers) and the pre- and post-training ADHD scores on an exploratory basis. Indeed, significant relationships with total displacement were found for all results (r = [0.24, 0.49], p = [0.0479, 1.6E-5]; all p-values for the ADHD score > 0.45). The thresholded mean total displacement values were then used as additional covariate in a repeated analysis. All results survived this control for in-scanner movement with one further cluster for the TAU group in the triangular gyrus (not significant after multiplicity adjustment; see Additional file 1: Table S3, upper section). Given the homogeneous effect on all investigated regions, the influence of total displacement was also investigated on a whole-brain level, resulting in weak but widespread patterns of correlations and anti-correlations (Additional file 1: Figure S3).

Exploratory analyses revealed correlations between changes in the LN subscale and the middle/ITG cluster from both groups (Spearman ρ = 0.41, p = 0.0133). The GFC and ReHo models yielded no significant effects.

Brain regulation task

During the “Up” and “Down” conditions (corresponding to the induction of negative and positive SCP shifts, respectively), primary and secondary visual areas were activated. No significant difference was found between the two conditions (i.e., no significant fMRI differentiation). Rolandic operculum activation (stretching into the anterior insula and the Heschl gyrus) during the “Down” condition significantly correlated with increases in ER after training. FMRI differentiation in the ITG showed a significant correlation with changes in CE. A further cluster barely missing corrected significance was detected for the correlation of higher fMRI differentiation in the ventral ACC and improvements in LN. The baseline ADHD score had no significant influence on any model. For details, see the lower section of Table 3 and right column of Fig. 1.

The only notable correlation with SCP shift amplitudes was found for the change in CE and the average differentiation achieved during the last quarter of the NF training (Spearman: ρ = 0.35, p = 0.1184; all other |ρ| < 0.15, p > 0.53) but was not significant.

Discussion

In this work, we used fMRI to assess the resting brain activity of adolescents with ASD and parental reports of their affective functioning before and after receiving SCP NF or TAU. In addition, the SCP NF group performed an in-scanner brain regulation task where the participants had to apply their regulation strategies after undergoing NF training. Using the whole-brain regulation data, we found relationships between the activation during regulation and improvements in different affective domains.

Affective symptom improvements and the potential influence of regulation strategies

Changes in resting activity and affective improvements over both groups without any interaction effects indicate unspecific positive effects of SCP NF and TAU. Furthermore, while localized correlations between brain activation during regulation and improvements on all investigated affective scales point towards an influence of NF, these improvements did not significantly correlate with SCP regulation measure used (i.e., the SCP shifts produced in the same direction for which the correlations with fMRI activation were detected). Heinrich, Gevensleben [69] likewise concluded universal improvements of emotional and behavioral self-regulation after successfully applying SCP NF in ADHD without finding correlations of training outcomes and symptom improvements. A possible interpretation of these findings may ascribe the affective improvements not to the achieved SCP regulation but to the application of regulation strategies. The correlation between fMRI differentiation and activation during the “Down” condition with affective improvements could indeed point towards highly individual activation patterns and strategies. In line with this speculation, Hasslinger, D'Agostini Souto [74] identified emotional strategies as one class of common regulation approaches in SCP NF when treating ADHD. Using the same classifications, strategies from the emotional domain were also frequently reported in this study (see supplement of [27]). Furthermore, ER is known to often be a key factor in the development of successful regulation strategies [75, 76]. It, however, should be noted that any comparison to NF training outcomes strongly depends on the definition of learning and the quantification of the regulation success.

The support of the experimenters needs consideration in regards to the origin of the correlation between fMRI differentiation in the right ITG and improvements in CE. Empathic comments after negative performance feedback were shown to decrease negative feelings [77]. The participants might have unintentionally related verbal positive reinforcement to their regulation strategies ultimately resulting in CE improvements. In a comparable scenario, the experimenters’ empathy was concluded to be a potential driving factor of subjective improvements in the sham group of a NF study in primary insomnia [78]. While the weaker correlation of the “Up” condition alone appears to support this hypothesis, the stronger effect for the fMRI differentiation is probably the best argument against such an additional unintentional effect.

In addition, the TAU group might have improved due to the supportive clinical counseling received, leading to no significant therapeutic advantage of SCP NF. The positive correlation between the LN subscale and the ADHD baseline score corroborates the well-documented emotion dysregulation in ADHD [79,80,81]. The stronger reduction of in-scanner head movement (total displacement) in the SCP group might result from the requirement to sit still for a longer time over repeated NF sessions.

The anterior cingulate cortex and emotional negativity

Similar to improvements on the psychometric level, we found an increase in ACC resting activity quantified as PerAF over both groups. Smaller gray matter volume (potentially presenting as decreased resting activity after structural normalization) as well as decreased metabolic rate in the ACC of individuals with ASD have been reported [82, 83]. A lack of activation in the ACC was also found for a stroop task in ADHD and related to the symptoms of inattention and impulsivity [85], which are likely shared between ADHD and ASD [86]. The increased ACC resting activity could thus constitute a treatment-induced compensatory effect.

Beyond changes in PerAF, the ventral part of the ACC also showed a negative correlation between fMRI differentiation and the change in the LN subscale of the ERC extending into the medial prefrontal cortex. The ACC is known to be related to repetitive behavior in ASD [87] but also to cognitive inflexibility in depression [88, 89]. The latter is potentially also represented in the LN subscale [90], providing further evidence that behavioral flexibility might be reflected in neuronal flexibility of the ACC.

The inferior temporal gyrus and cognitive empathy

General as well as regionally specific alterations in temporal lobe structures related to ASD are well known [91, 92]. Smaller gray matter volume of the right ITG was previously related to a higher probability of an ASD diagnosis [93]. Reduced gray matter volume of the left ITG was also detected in children with low-functioning ASD [94] and related to communication skills [95]. Similar to the ACC, smaller gray matter volume in the ITG might be related to less activity after structural normalization, relating our finding of an increase after NF training to compensatory processes. The positive correlation of PerAF changes in the rITG cluster with changes in emotional negativity (LN subscale) would imply a worsening in emotional negativity accompanying an increase in ITG activity. This, however, is in contradiction with our other findings and might be owed to the exploratory nature of the analysis.

Besides the temporal lobe results found at rest, which did not survive correction for the number of models, we also identified a positive correlation between fMRI differentiation in the right ITG and improvements in CE. Laterality of this correlation as well as specificity for cognitive compared to affective empathy are supported by findings in unilateral mesial temporal lobe epilepsy [97] and personal/impersonal emotional imagery [98].

The Rolandic operculum and emotion regulation

The correlation between the “Down” condition (SCP positivity) and the increase in the ER score mostly covers the posterior Rolandic operculum reaching to the insula and superior temporal gyrus. This particular result might be explained by the role of the Rolandic operculum in language encoding [100] and emotion processing [101]: Reduced activation was found in the left Rolandic operculum of adults with ASD compared to neurotypical individuals regarding speech [102]. The Rolandic operculum further showed increased activation during emotion induction with happy compared to sad music [103]. Similar results were obtained for the superior temporal gyrus of children with low-functioning autism and age-matched controls using speech recordings of their parents and each child’s favorite song containing vocals [104]. These previous findings suggest two possible conclusions related to NF: First, our reported activation related to improvements on the ER subscale was evoked by self-induced positive mood, possibly in combination with sound imagination. Second, less severe language deficits facilitated the development of strategies involving inner speech, which had a positive impact on ER.

On the role of SCP positivity in particular, we can only make an indirect assumption: Better SCP differentiation was previously associated with less relaxation when trying to produce negative SCP shifts [105], suggesting that the potentially induced positive mood is a side effect of more relaxation when trying to produce positive shifts.

The precentral gyrus at rest

Lastly, we found an increase in resting activity in the right motor cortex of the TAU group, which was biased by a baseline difference. The unspecific correlations to the amount of in-scanner head motion, the fact that motion decreased in the SCP NF but PerAF increased in the TAU group and the effect surviving a correction for motion on group-level, speak against movement-related motor activity as sole cause. Altered connectivity of motor regions [107, 108] as well as motor impairments [109] are known in ASD. Higher visuomotor impairment was associated with increased ALFF in the precentral cortex, among other regions [110]. Furthermore, ASD without ADHD was shown to be related to increased and ADHD to decreased gray matter in the precentral gyrus among other regions [111, 112]. Assuming that the baseline difference in precentral gyrus PerAF is reflecting more deficits/higher symptom severity in pre-treatment measures in the SCP NF group (i.e., increased movement, higher SRS scores), the observed increase in the TAU group cannot be seen as a positive therapeutic effect.

Limitations

Some results barely missed statistical significance after multiplicity adjustment, but were deemed relevant in relation to others and thus further discussed. Despite correcting for in-scanner head movement far beyond the standard procedure in multiple steps, residual artifacts are likely present in the data, as can be concluded from the correlation with the RS models (see Additional file 1: Figure S1). However, since the PerAF findings survived an additional control for the quantified motion on group-level, in-scanner movements unlikely are the cause of our findings. A potential preventive approach to further reduce head motion in future studies might be the low-demand video “Inscapes” [113]. The brain regulation data could only be reasonably acquired in the NF group and after the training, so all conclusions drawn from the data are necessarily purely correlational. We also kept the acquisition as short as possible expecting increasing movement and decreasing attention throughout each session.

During the brain regulation task, we could not check whether participants really applied the strategies learned. Concurrent EEG recordings were not possible but would have been of little use in this case since, on average, our participants did not gain control over the SCP signal in the absence of feedback (27).

Conclusion

SCP NF as well as TAU led to unspecific positive effects over both treatment groups. These effects comprise increases in resting activity in regions known to be affected in ASD and improvements in several affective domains. The affective improvements correlated with the activation corresponding to SCP regulation in comparable regions. The neuronal effects were, however, largely unrelated to the achieved degree of SCP regulation during NF training. Besides corroborating the role of regional alterations and affective functioning in ASD, our findings suggest that the application of distinct NF regulation strategies rather than SCP NF itself leads to affective symptom improvements. Future research is needed to clarify the distinct influences of SCP positivity and negativity as well as the role of individual regulation strategies.

Availability of data and materials

Due to reasons of data protection, the preprocessed data is available only upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

(f)ALFF:

(Fractional) amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations

ACC:

Anterior cingulate cortex

ADHD:

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

ADI-R:

Autism Diagnostic Interview—Revised

ADOS-2:

Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, version 2

ASD:

Autism spectrum disorder

BOLD:

Blood-oxygenation-level-dependent

CE:

Cognitive Empathy subscale of GEM

CNV:

Contingent negative variation

DISYPS-II:

Diagnostic System for Psychiatric Disease in Children and Adolescent, parent-rated version 2

EEG:

Electroencephalography

ER:

Emotion Regulation subscale of the ERC

ERC:

Emotion Regulation Checklist

FEW:

Family-wise error

fMRI:

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

FWHM:

Full with at half maximum

GEM:

Griffith Empathy Measure

GFC:

Global functional connectivity

ITG:

Inferior temporal gyrus

LME:

Linear mixed effect

LN:

Lability/Negativity subscale of the ERC

NF:

Neurofeedback

PACE:

Prospective acquisition correction

PerAF:

Percent amplitude of fluctuations

ReHo:

Regional homogeneity

RS:

Resting-state

SCP:

Slow cortical potential

SPM12:

Statistical Parametric Mapping, version 12

TAU:

Treatment as usual

WAIS:

Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale

WISC:

Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children

References

  1. McPartland J, Volkmar FR. Chapter 23—Autism and related disorders. In: Aminoff MJ, Boller F, Swaab DF, editors. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Correll CU, Cortese S, Croatto G, Monaco F, Krinitski D, Arrondo G, et al. Efficacy and acceptability of pharmacological, psychosocial, and brain stimulation interventions in children and adolescents with mental disorders: an umbrella review. World Psychiatry. 2021;20(2):244–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Famitafreshi H, Karimian M. Overview of the recent advances in pathophysiology and treatment for autism. CNS Neurol Disorders Drug Targets. 2018;17(8):590–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Khaleghi A, Zarafshan H, Vand SR, Mohammadi MR. Effects of non-invasive neurostimulation on autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2020;18(4):527–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Amatachaya A, Auvichayapat N, Patjanasoontorn N, Suphakunpinyo C, Ngernyam N, Aree-Uea B, et al. Effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on autism: a randomized double-blind crossover trial. Behav Neurol. 2014;2014: 173073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Amatachaya A, Jensen MP, Patjanasoontorn N, Auvichayapat N, Suphakunpinyo C, Janjarasjitt S, et al. The short-term effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on electroencephalography in children with autism: a randomized crossover controlled trial. Behav Neurol. 2015;2015: 928631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Prillinger K, Radev ST, Amador de Lara G, Klobl M, Lanzenberger R, Plener PL, et al. Repeated sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation on adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, and sham-controlled clinical trial. Front Psychiatry. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.680525/full.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Anninos P, Chatzimichael A, Adamopoulos A, Kotini A, Tsagas N. A combined study of MEG and pico-Tesla TMS on children with autism disorder. J Integr Neurosci. 2016;15(4):497–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Doruk Camsari D, Kirkovski M, Croarkin PE. Therapeutic applications of noninvasive neuromodulation in children and adolescents. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2018;41(3):465–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Panerai S, Tasca D, Lanuzza B, Trubia G, Ferri R, Musso S, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in performing eye-hand integration tasks: four preliminary studies with children showing low-functioning autism. Autism Int J Res Prac. 2014;18(6):638–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Arns M, Heinrich H, Strehl U. Evaluation of neurofeedback in ADHD: the long and winding road. Biol Psychol. 2014;95:108–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sonuga-Barke EJ, Brandeis D, Cortese S, Daley D, Ferrin M, Holtmann M, et al. Nonpharmacological interventions for ADHD: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of dietary and psychological treatments. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170(3):275–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mayer K, Wyckoff SN, Strehl U. One size fits all? Slow cortical potentials neurofeedback: a review. J Atten Disord. 2013;17(5):393–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Drechsler R, Straub M, Doehnert M, Heinrich H, Steinhausen HC, Brandeis D. 1Controlled evaluation of a neurofeedback training of slow cortical potentials in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Behavioral Brain Functions BBF. 2007;3:35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Strehl U, Aggensteiner P, Wachtlin D, Brandeis D, Albrecht B, Arana M, et al. Neurofeedback of slow cortical potentials in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a multicenter randomized trial controlling for unspecific effects. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00135/full.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Strehl U, Leins U, Goth G, Klinger C, Hinterberger T, Birbaumer N. Self-regulation of slow cortical potentials: a new treatment for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics. 2006;118(5):e1530–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Albrecht JS, Bubenzer-Busch S, Gallien A, Knospe EL, Gaber TJ, Zepf FD. Effects of a structured 20-session slow-cortical-potential-based neurofeedback program on attentional performance in children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: retrospective analysis of an open-label pilot-approach and 6-month follow-up. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017;13:667–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mayer K, Blume F, Wyckoff SN, Brokmeier LL, Strehl U. Neurofeedback of slow cortical potentials as a treatment for adults with attention deficit-/hyperactivity disorder. Clin Neurophysiol Official J Int Feder Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127(2):1374–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Birbaumer N, Elbert T, Canavan AG, Rockstroh B. Slow potentials of the cerebral cortex and behavior. Physiol Rev. 1990;70(1):1–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. He BJ, Raichle ME. The fMRI signal, slow cortical potential and consciousness. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009;13(7):302–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khader P, Schicke T, Röder B, Rösler F. On the relationship between slow cortical potentials and BOLD signal changes in humans. Int J Psychophysiol. 2008;67(3):252–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Direito B, Lima J, Simões M, Sayal A, Sousa T, Lührs M, et al. Targeting dynamic facial processing mechanisms in superior temporal sulcus using a novel fMRI neurofeedback target. Neuroscience. 2019;406:97–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Direito B, Mouga S, Sayal A, Simões M, Quental H, Bernardino I, et al. Training the social brain: clinical and neural effects of an 8-week real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback Phase IIa clinical trial in Autism. Autism Int J Res Prac. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211002052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Holtmann M, Steiner S, Hohmann S, Poustka L, Banaschewski T, Bölte S. Neurofeedback in autism spectrum disorders. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(11):986–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Leitner Y. The co-occurrence of autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children—what do we know? Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hurt E, Arnold LE, Lofthouse N. Quantitative EEG neurofeedback for the treatment of pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorders, learning disorders, and epilepsy. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2014;23(3):465–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Konicar L, Radev S, Prillinger K, Klöbl M, Diehm R, Birbaumer N, et al. Volitional modification of brain activity in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: a bayesian analysis of slow cortical potential neurofeedback. NeuroImage Clinical. 2021;29: 102557.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Prillinger K, Radev ST, Doganay K, Poustka L, Konicar L. Impulsivity moderates the effect of neurofeedback training on the contingent negative variation in autism spectrum disorder. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.838080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vaidya CJ, You X, Mostofsky S, Pereira F, Berl MM, Kenworthy L. Data-driven identification of subtypes of executive function across typical development, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and autism spectrum disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020;61(1):51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Taurines R, Schwenck C, Westerwald E, Sachse M, Siniatchkin M, Freitag C. ADHD and autism: differential diagnosis or overlapping traits? a selective review. Attention Deficit Hyperact Dis. 2012;4(3):115–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Waddington F, Franke B, Hartman C, Buitelaar JK, Rommelse N, Mota NR. A polygenic risk score analysis of ASD and ADHD across emotion recognition subtypes. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2021;186(7):401–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Waddington F, Hartman C, de Bruijn Y, Lappenschaar M, Oerlemans A, Buitelaar J, et al. An emotion recognition subtyping approach to studying the heterogeneity and comorbidity of autism spectrum disorders and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Neurodev Disord. 2018;10(1):31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ros R, Graziano PA. A transdiagnostic examination of self-regulation: comparisons across preschoolers with ASD, ADHD, and typically developing children. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2020;49(4):493–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Helfer B, Boxhoorn S, Songa J, Steel C, Maltezos S, Asherson P. Emotion recognition and mind wandering in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or autism spectrum disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2021;134:89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mazza M, Pino MC, Mariano M, Tempesta D, Ferrara M, De Berardis D, et al. Affective and cognitive empathy in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ziermans T, de Bruijn Y, Dijkhuis R, Staal W, Swaab H. Impairments in cognitive empathy and alexithymia occur independently of executive functioning in college students with autism. Autism Int J Res Prac. 2019;23(6):1519–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. McKenzie K, Russell A, Golm D, Fairchild G. Empathic accuracy and cognitive and affective empathy in young adults with and without autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disorders. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05093-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cai RY, Richdale AL, Uljarević M, Dissanayake C, Samson AC. Emotion regulation in autism spectrum disorder: where we are and where we need to go. Autism Res. 2018;11(7):962–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Reyes NM, Pickard K, Reaven J. Emotion regulation: a treatment target for autism spectrum disorder. Bull Menninger Clin. 2019;83(3):205–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mohammad-Rezazadeh I, Frohlich J, Loo SK, Jeste SS. Brain connectivity in autism spectrum disorder. Curr Opin Neurol. 2016;29(2):137–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. King JB, Prigge MBD, King CK, Morgan J, Weathersby F, Fox JC, et al. Generalizability and reproducibility of functional connectivity in autism. Mol Autism. 2019;10:27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yerys BE, Herrington JD, Satterthwaite TD, Guy L, Schultz RT, Bassett DS. Globally weaker and topologically different: resting-state connectivity in youth with autism. Mol Autism. 2017;8:39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang W, Liu J, Shi S, Liu T, Ma L, Ma X, et al. Altered resting-state functional activity in patients with autism spectrum disorder: a quantitative meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2018;9:556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Di Martino A, Yan CG, Li Q, Denio E, Castellanos FX, Alaerts K, et al. The autism brain imaging data exchange: towards a large-scale evaluation of the intrinsic brain architecture in autism. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19(6):659–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hinterberger T, Veit R, Strehl U, Trevorrow T, Erb M, Kotchoubey B, et al. Brain areas activated in fMRI during self-regulation of slow cortical potentials (SCPs). Exp Brain Res. 2003;152(1):113–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Strehl U, Trevorrow T, Veit R, Hinterberger T, Kotchoubey B, Erb M, et al. Deactivation of brain areas during self-regulation of slow cortical potentials in seizure patients. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2006;31(1):85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Jia X-Z, Sun J-W, Ji G-J, Liao W, Lv Y-T, Wang J, et al. Percent amplitude of fluctuation: a simple measure for resting-state fMRI signal at single voxel level. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(1): e0227021.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Tagliazucchi E, Roseman L, Kaelen M, Orban C, Muthukumaraswamy SD, Murphy K, et al. Increased global functional connectivity correlates with LSD-induced ego dissolution. Current Biol. 2016;26(8):1043–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Jiang L, Zuo X-N. Regional homogeneity: a multimodal, multiscale neuroimaging marker of the human connectome. Neuroscientist. 2016;22(5):486–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zang Y, Jiang T, Lu Y, He Y, Tian L. Regional homogeneity approach to fMRI data analysis. Neuroimage. 2004;22(1):394–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Bölte S, Poustka F, Rühl D, Schmötzer G. Diagnostisches Interview für Autismus-Revidiert (ADI-R). Bern: Huber/Hogrefe Verlag; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Poustka L, Rühl D, Feineis-Matthews S, Poustka F, Hartung M, Bölte S. ADOS-2. Diagnostische Beobachtungsskala für Autistische Störungen. 2 Deutschsprachige Fassung der Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule: Testzentrale/Huber, Mannheim; 2015.

  53. Wechsler D, Petermann F, Petermann U. Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenztest für Kinder—IV (HAWIK-IV). Pearson/testzentrale; 2010.

  54. Wechsler D, Petermann F. Wechsler adult intelligence scale—fourth edition. Deutschsprachige adaption der WAIS-IV von D Wechsler: Pearson/testzentrale; 2012.

  55. Shields A, Cicchetti D. Emotion regulation among school-age children: the development and validation of a new criterion Q-sort scale. Dev Psychol. 1997;33(6):906–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Dadds MR, Hunter K, Hawes DJ, Frost ADJ, Vassallo S, Bunn P, et al. A measure of cognitive and affective empathy in children using parent ratings. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2008;39(2):111–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Döpfner M, Görtz-Dorten A, Lehmkuhl G, Breuer D, Goletz H. Diagnostik-System für psychische Störungen nach ICD-10 und DSM-IV für Kinder und Jugendliche—II (DISYPS-II). Testzentrale/Huber, Bern; 2008.

  58. Moessnang C, Schäfer A, Bilek E, Roux P, Otto K, Baumeister S, et al. Specificity, reliability and sensitivity of social brain responses during spontaneous mentalizing. Soc Cognitive Affect Neurosci. 2016;11(11):1687–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Beall EB, Lowe MJ. Isolating physiologic noise sources with independently determined spatial measures. Neuroimage. 2007;37(4):1286–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Beall EB, Lowe MJ. SimPACE: generating simulated motion corrupted BOLD data with synthetic-navigated acquisition for the development and evaluation of SLOMOCO: a new, highly effective slicewise motion correction. Neuroimage. 2014;101:21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Wilke M, Altaye M, Holland SK. CerebroMatic: a versatile toolbox for spline-based MRI template creation. Front Comput Neurosci. 2017;11:5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Mueller K, Lepsien J, Möller HE, Lohmann G. Commentary: cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Patel AX, Kundu P, Rubinov M, Jones PS, Vértes PE, Ersche KD, et al. A wavelet method for modeling and despiking motion artifacts from resting-state fMRI time series. Neuroimage. 2014;95(100):287–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Behzadi Y, Restom K, Liau J, Liu TT. A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. Neuroimage. 2007;37(1):90–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Klöbl M, Michenthaler P, Godbersen GM, Robinson S, Hahn A, Lanzenberger R. Reinforcement and punishment shape the learning dynamics in fMRI neurofeedback. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;14:304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Friston KJ, Williams S, Howard R, Frackowiak RS, Turner R. Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series. Magn Reson Med. 1996;35(3):346–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Hallquist MN, Hwang K, Luna B. The nuisance of nuisance regression: spectral misspecification in a common approach to resting-state fMRI preprocessing reintroduces noise and obscures functional connectivity. Neuroimage. 2013;82:208–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Olszowy W, Aston J, Rua C, Williams GB. Accurate autocorrelation modeling substantially improves fMRI reliability. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Heinrich H, Gevensleben H, Becker A, Rothenberger A. Effects of neurofeedback on the dysregulation profile in children with ADHD: SCP NF meets SDQ-DP—a retrospective analysis. Psychol Med. 2020;50(2):258–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Chen G, Cox RW, Glen DR, Rajendra JK, Reynolds RC, Taylor PA. A tail of two sides: artificially doubled false positive rates in neuroimaging due to the sidedness choice with t-tests. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019;40(3):1037–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Sankoh AJ, Huque MF, Dubey SD. Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials. Stat Med. 1997;16(22):2529–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Bölte S, Poustka F. Skala zur Erfassung sozialer Reaktivität (SRS). Deutsche Fassung der Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) von John N Constantino und Christian P Gruber: Testzentrale/Huber, Bern; 2008.

  73. Xia M, Wang J, He Y. BrainNet viewer: a network visualization tool for human brain connectomics. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7): e68910.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Hasslinger J, D’Agostini Souto M, Folkesson Hellstadius L, Bölte S. Neurofeedback in ADHD: a qualitative study of strategy use in slow cortical potential training. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(6): e0233343.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Eldeeb S, Susam BT, Akcakaya M, Conner CM, White SW, Mazefsky CA. Trial by trial EEG based BCI for distress versus non distress classification in individuals with ASD. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6000.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Friedrich EV, Sivanathan A, Lim T, Suttie N, Louchart S, Pillen S, et al. An effective neurofeedback intervention to improve social interactions in children with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;45(12):4084–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Seehausen M, Kazzer P, Bajbouj M, Heekeren HR, Jacobs AM, Klann-Delius G, et al. Effects of empathic social responses on the emotions of the recipient. Brain Cogn. 2016;103:50–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Schabus M, Griessenberger H, Gnjezda MT, Heib DPJ, Wislowska M, Hoedlmoser K. Better than sham? A double-blind placebo-controlled neurofeedback study in primary insomnia. Brain J Neurol. 2017;140(4):1041–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Christiansen H, Hirsch O, Albrecht B, Chavanon ML. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and emotion regulation over the life span. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019;21(3):17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Shaw P, Stringaris A, Nigg J, Leibenluft E. Emotion dysregulation in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(3):276–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Seymour KE, Chronis-Tuscano A, Iwamoto DK, Kurdziel G, MacPherson L. Emotion regulation mediates the association between ADHD and depressive symptoms in a community sample of youth. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2014;42(4):611–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Haznedar MM, Buchsbaum MS, Metzger M, Solimando A, Spiegel-Cohen J, Hollander E. Anterior cingulate gyrus volume and glucose metabolism in autistic disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154(8):1047–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Laidi C, Boisgontier J, de Pierrefeu A, Duchesnay E, Hotier S, d’Albis M-A, et al. Decreased cortical thickness in the anterior cingulate cortex in adults with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2019;49(4):1402–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Qi S, Morris R, Turner JA, Fu Z, Jiang R, Deramus TP, et al. Common and unique multimodal covarying patterns in autism spectrum disorder subtypes. Molecular Autism. 2020;11(1):90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Bush G, Frazier JA, Rauch SL, Seidman LJ, Whalen PJ, Jenike MA, et al. Anterior cingulate cortex dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder revealed by fMRI and the counting stroop. Biol Psychiat. 1999;45(12):1542–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Krakowski AD, Cost KT, Anagnostou E, Lai M-C, Crosbie J, Schachar R, et al. Inattention and hyperactive/impulsive component scores do not differentiate between autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a clinical sample. Molecular Autism. 2020;11(1):28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Thakkar KN, Polli FE, Joseph RM, Tuch DS, Hadjikhani N, Barton JJ, et al. Response monitoring, repetitive behaviour and anterior cingulate abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Brain J Neurol. 2008;131(Pt 9):2464–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Doss MK, Považan M, Rosenberg MD, Sepeda ND, Davis AK, Finan PH, et al. Psilocybin therapy increases cognitive and neural flexibility in patients with major depressive disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2021;11(1):574.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Schwartz J, Ordaz SJ, Kircanski K, Ho TC, Davis EG, Camacho MC, et al. Resting-state functional connectivity and inflexibility of daily emotions in major depression. J Affect Disord. 2019;249:26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Loevaas MES, Sund AM, Patras J, Martinsen K, Hjemdal O, Neumer SP, et al. Emotion regulation and its relation to symptoms of anxiety and depression in children aged 8–12 years: does parental gender play a differentiating role? BMC Psychol. 2018;6(1):42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Gendry Meresse I, Zilbovicius M, Boddaert N, Robel L, Philippe A, Sfaello I, et al. Autism severity and temporal lobe functional abnormalities. Ann Neurol. 2005;58(3):466–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Zilbovicius M, Boddaert N, Belin P, Poline JB, Remy P, Mangin JF, et al. Temporal lobe dysfunction in childhood autism: a PET study positron emission tomography. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157(12):1988–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Neeley ES, Bigler ED, Krasny L, Ozonoff S, McMahon W, Lainhart JE. Quantitative temporal lobe differences: autism distinguished from controls using classification and regression tree analysis. Brain Dev. 2007;29(7):389–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Riva D, Annunziata S, Contarino V, Erbetta A, Aquino D, Bulgheroni S. Gray matter reduction in the vermis and CRUS-II is associated with social and interaction deficits in low-functioning children with autistic spectrum disorders: a VBM-DARTEL study. Cerebellum. 2013;12(5):676–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Duan Y, Zhao W, Luo C, Liu X, Jiang H, Tang Y, et al. Identifying and predicting autism spectrum disorder based on multi-site structural MRI with machine learning. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.765517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Lan Z, Xu S, Wu Y, Xia L, Hua K, Li M, et al. Alterations of regional homogeneity in preschool boys with autism spectrum disorders. Front Neurosci. 2021;15: 644543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Toller G, Adhimoolam B, Rankin KP, Huppertz HJ, Kurthen M, Jokeit H. Right fronto-limbic atrophy is associated with reduced empathy in refractory unilateral mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuropsychologia. 2015;78:80–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Preston SD, Bechara A, Damasio H, Grabowski TJ, Stansfield RB, Mehta S, et al. The neural substrates of cognitive empathy. Soc Neurosci. 2007;2(3–4):254–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Blefari ML, Martuzzi R, Salomon R, Bello-Ruiz J, Herbelin B, Serino A, et al. Bilateral Rolandic operculum processing underlying heartbeat awareness reflects changes in bodily self-consciousness. Eur J Neurosci. 2017;45(10):1300–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Indefrey P, Brown CM, Hellwig F, Amunts K, Herzog H, Seitz RJ, et al. A neural correlate of syntactic encoding during speech production. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001;98(10):5933–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Sutoko S, Atsumori H, Obata A, Funane T, Kandori A, Shimonaga K, et al. Lesions in the right Rolandic operculum are associated with self-rating affective and apathetic depressive symptoms for post-stroke patients. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):20264.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Gebauer L, Skewes J, Hørlyck L, Vuust P. Atypical perception of affective prosody in Autism spectrum disorder. NeuroImage Clin. 2014;6:370–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Gebauer L, Skewes J, Westphael G, Heaton P, Vuust P. Intact brain processing of musical emotions in autism spectrum disorder, but more cognitive load and arousal in happy vs sad music. 2014. Front Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00192.

  104. Lai G, Pantazatos SP, Schneider H, Hirsch J. Neural systems for speech and song in autism. Brain J Neurol. 2012;135(Pt 3):961–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Brody S, Rau H, Köhler F, Schupp H, Lutzenberger W, Birbaumer N. Slow cortical potential biofeedback and the startle reflex. Biofeedback Self Regul. 1994;19(1):1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Keller M, Zweerings J, Klasen M, Zvyagintsev M, Iglesias J, Mendoza Quiñones R, et al. fMRI neurofeedback-enhanced cognitive reappraisal training in depression: a double-blind comparison of left and right vlPFC regulation. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12: 715898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Carper RA, Solders S, Treiber JM, Fishman I, Müller R-A. Corticospinal tract anatomy and functional connectivity of primary motor cortex in autism. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015;54(10):859–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Nebel MB, Eloyan A, Barber AD, Mostofsky SH. Precentral gyrus functional connectivity signatures of autism. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014;8:80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Duffield TC, Trontel HG, Bigler ED, Froehlich A, Prigge MB, Travers B, et al. Neuropsychological investigation of motor impairments in autism. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2013;35(8):867–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Wang Z, Wang Y, Sweeney JA, Gong Q, Lui S, Mosconi MW. Resting-State brain network dysfunctions associated with visuomotor impairments in autism spectrum disorder. Front Integr Neurosci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2019.00017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Mahajan R, Dirlikov B, Crocetti D, Mostofsky SH. Motor circuit anatomy in children with autism spectrum disorder with or without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Autism Res. 2016;9(1):67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Bralten J, Greven CU, Franke B, Mennes M, Zwiers MP, Rommelse NN, et al. Voxel-based morphometry analysis reveals frontal brain differences in participants with ADHD and their unaffected siblings. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2016;41(4):272–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Vanderwal T, Kelly C, Eilbott J, Mayes LC, Castellanos FX. Inscapes: a movie paradigm to improve compliance in functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage. 2015;122:222–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful towards our participants and their parents and the students of the ABC BRAIN LAB, who supported us during this study. Furthermore, we would like to thank the psychologists, psychiatrists and therapists, social workers and hospital staff of the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry of the Medical University of Vienna. Lastly, we want to thank Murray Bruce Reed of the Neuroimaging Labs for his help in language and style editing.

Funding

This project was funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF): KLI600B27.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry & Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Manfred Klöbl & Rupert Lanzenberger

  2. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Karin Prillinger, Kamer Doganay, Paul Plener & Lilian Konicar

  3. Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Robert Diehm

  4. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

    Luise Poustka

  5. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany

    Paul Plener

Authors
  1. Manfred Klöbl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karin Prillinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert Diehm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kamer Doganay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rupert Lanzenberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Luise Poustka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Paul Plener
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lilian Konicar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LK, LP and RL conceptualized the study. LK acquired the funding. LK, RL and MK planned the MRI measurements. MK conducted the MRI measurements with support from LK, KP, RD and KD. KP, RD, KD and LK performed the NF training and monitored the collection of the questionnaire data. MK analyzed the data presented in this manuscript and compiled the original draft. KP, LK and RL preformed the administrative tasks for this study. PP and RL provided the resources for this study. PP, LP and RL supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lilian Konicar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The overall clinical trial and all parts presented here were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the good scientific practice guidelines of the Medical University of Vienna. The project was approved by the institutional review board (EK-Nr.: 1850/2015). Informed assent was given by the participants and informed consent was provided by the parents/legal guardian.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Rupert Lanzenberger received travel grants and/or conference speaker honoraria within the last three years from Bruker BioSpin MR and Heel, and has served as a consultant for Ono Pharmaceutical. He received investigator-initiated research funding from Siemens Healthcare regarding clinical research using PET/MR. He is a shareholder of the start-up company BM Health GmbH since 2019.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Table S1. False-positive rates of three multiplicity correction approaches. Table S2. Overview of the psychometric and behavioral data. Table S3. Results of the whole-brain resting-state analysis and brain regulation task with and without control for movement on group level and Sidak correction. Figure S1. Correlation between resting-state models and SLOMOCO total displacement.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klöbl, M., Prillinger, K., Diehm, R. et al. Individual brain regulation as learned via neurofeedback is related to affective changes in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 17, 6 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-022-00549-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-022-00549-9

Keywords

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health

ISSN: 1753-2000